Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#61

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

frazzled wrote:
03Lightningrocks wrote:
Liberty wrote:While I believe in cooperating with the police .. showing the CHL .. I am wondering whether its a good idea to show our CHL to a Houston cop, or Harris county Deputy. They have proven they are the enemy and not to be trusted. If they are out to get us as CHLers maybe we probably shouldn't be giving them ammunition.

I'm still trying to sort this out, buy it does seem as though they are the ones that have picked this battle .. Starting with Chuck Rosenthal.
I only get to Houston maybe once a month or so but the times I am there I dread getting pulled over by that geztapo law enforcement community. The couple times I had the pleasure of meeting Houstons finest reminded me of little punk kids in high school with an axe to grind. Rude is not a strong enough word for how they acted but is all that will be allowed on this forum.

I am always polite to cops hoping they won't taze me. My thought when the Houston cops walked back to the car was..."please get run over".

To be more serious. The first time I was pulled over in Houston, I thought maybe the guy was just having a bad day. then the next time was just as unpleasant and I thought "no, this isn't just a coincidence, Houston cops have a major bad attitude going on". :mrgreen:
I've never had these problems and never had these issues.
Maybe you should drive better and avoid all these times you get pulled over. Obeying traffic laws does wonders for limiting being pulled over.
People that don't like Houston can leave or don't come here. Don't let the door hit your rear on the way out.
You may be the only driver in Houston that subscribes to this belief. 90% of the drivers I observed will run over you if your doing less than 20 mph over the speed limit. Regardless, I drive just fine, thank you. Especially when compared to some of the crazy drivers around Houston. Trust me, I only go there when I have to and I keep my visit just as short as possible. :thumbs2:

frazzled

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#62

Post by frazzled »

Hey can't handle the big city then sorry.

DONT TREAD ON ME

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#63

Post by DONT TREAD ON ME »

frazzled wrote:Hey can't handle the big city then sorry.
If this is an example of a person from Houston, then...

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#64

Post by KD5NRH »

XtremeDuty.45 wrote:
frazzled wrote:Hey can't handle the big city then sorry.
If this is an example of a person from Houston, then...
They're just frustrated because they never manage to be number one at anything.

On the other hand, they're:
70th most dangerous
9th worst for dating
8th worst place to raise a family
8th worst for commuters
2nd worst for skin

Of course, if they keep trying that hard, they're bound to be number one in something eventually.

Crapshoot
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:30 am
Location: San Antonio

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#65

Post by Crapshoot »

Purplehood wrote:
Abraham wrote:LEO's are as individual as you or me.

I have three cop friends, one HPD, one LaPorte PD, one Baytown PD and a number of cop acquaintances who are all pro-CHL.

In fact, I've yet to know one who isn't.

So, please don't lump them all into a anti-CHL category.

It just isn't so.
:iagree:

Keep in mind that when you are stopped, you may not realize that you too are projecting an attitude (be it positive or negative). That can have alot of bearing on how the LEO handles your particular stop.

I always try to project courtesy (not fawning adoration), and I can only recall getting the same in return even while the LEO merrily writes my citation
.
+1 :iagree:
‘‘We, the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.’’
— Abraham Lincoln
CHL
NRA
Conservative American
Die Hard Texan
User avatar

roberts
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:24 pm

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#66

Post by roberts »

As long as Gary Blankinship is their spokesman, I will keep on driving and mind my own business if I ever see a Houston cop in trouble. I don't want them to wet themselves if they observe my weapon. Or shoot me for trying to help.
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT DUCK HUNTING
User avatar

lonewolf
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: Euless

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#67

Post by lonewolf »

All this talk about the Houston cops, and their apparent paranoia makes me wonder if they aren't running scared. Are things out of control there? It appears that they are seriously on the defensive, and rather than ever being proactive with regards to crime and criminals are being reactive.....

I can see where there might be a preference to patrolling the crazy highways rather than cruising some of the rabbit warrens of lower income apartments, or cruising the dark warehouse areas.

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#68

Post by bdickens »

I've been stopped by HPD and the officer didn't seem too concerned.
Byron Dickens

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#69

Post by srothstein »

When it comes to Gary Blankinship, I just wanted to point out one thing. He is the union president. I mention this because of a conversation I had a long time ago. Many cops were wondering why the police unions were endorsing a specific candidate for office that none of the cops were known to support. I asked the union president about it. He explained to me that unions exist for one thing only, and that is labor negotiations. They support candidates that will benefit labor. They endorse these candidates (and take political positions) based on this labor position.

So, I asked how come they keep getting identified as police endorsements. This leads the public to believe that they are endorsed based on their crime/criminal/public safety attitudes and not on their labor attitudes. He said he understood that and that this is one of the reasons so many politicians ask for police labor endorsements. It gives them a lot more political clout because the politicians cannot afford to be seen as anti-police or soft on crime. And cops keep electing these type of labor leaders because they do what they are supposed to as labor leaders. They get better contracts and benefits for the officers. Cops are human and like better paychecks as much as anyone else.

So, when you see a union president making a statement like "we don't like this law", remember that this is a political statement made from a labor perspective. It may have been a favor called in or being laid out. It is not what the cops on the street necessarily feel. And, for future reference, remember this any time you see a politician claiming an endorsement from a police union. It is almost always going to be based on their labor relations positions and not on their crime positions.
Steve Rothstein

dac1842
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:15 pm

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#70

Post by dac1842 »

Liberty wrote:
dac1842 wrote:True Police of any type are not required to notify as we are. But the fact is, most do. I was an LEO for many years, everytime I stopped another LEO he would identify himself immediately as an LEO and let me know if he was packing. Most understand the importance of the notification and the effect that the notificaiton has on the officers state of mind. I know someone will take off on that, and that is your right. Until you have walked in those shoes, don't critisize those that have.
Police will seldom get a ticket if the identify themselves as a "brother officer"
Liberty, that is not the point, true as it is. The point is that most officer, will announce if they are carrying a weapon.
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#71

Post by Liberty »

dac1842 wrote:
Liberty wrote:
dac1842 wrote:True Police of any type are not required to notify as we are. But the fact is, most do. I was an LEO for many years, everytime I stopped another LEO he would identify himself immediately as an LEO and let me know if he was packing. Most understand the importance of the notification and the effect that the notificaiton has on the officers state of mind. I know someone will take off on that, and that is your right. Until you have walked in those shoes, don't critisize those that have.
Police will seldom get a ticket if the identify themselves as a "brother officer"
Liberty, that is not the point, true as it is. The point is that most officer, will announce if they are carrying a weapon.
The point is about motivation.
What's in it for me a civilian If I show my CHL?
What's in it for the LEO?

BTW I intend on showing my CHL to most LEOs if asked for an ID, but I must admit I am wondering if I should to Harris county LEOs, I question whether I should out of respect for the department. While I have a lot of respect most officers in Texas, Harris County seems to be in a league of its own, and from what I see and here they don't seem to respect us citizens much..
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy

dicion
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#72

Post by dicion »

dac1842 wrote:
roberts wrote:As long as Gary Blankinship is their spokesman, I will keep on driving and mind my own business if I ever see a Houston cop in trouble. I don't want them to wet themselves if they observe my weapon. Or shoot me for trying to help.
You must be kidding me. If you observed an officer in trouble you would not stop?
:iagree:

I'm sorry, but I can't just drive by someone obviously in trouble, and need of help. Police officer or not.

A few women on the side of the road with a flat, a spare out, and obviously no experience in changing a tire? I'll stop (And yes, you can Easily tell this in about 2 seconds. If you happen to drive by it)
However, if they have a gentleman with them, I will assume that he knows how to change a tire, and will continue on, unless he is standing there scratching his head too. :smilelol5:

An Officer on the side of the road in a door-to-door shootout with someone? No, I won't Stop, Rather, I'd aim my vehicle directly into the perp. I have airbags and a seat belt. I'll be fine.
User avatar

lonewolf
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: Euless

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#73

Post by lonewolf »

People in real trouble need help. Its up to you do decide when, if, and what help you give. Evaluate the scene right quick and make a decision. Two guys and two gals with a flat tire? I'm on down the road. They should have a cell phone and some more friends. And know how to change a tire.

An old lady? I'll stop to help, after approaching in a non-threatening manner with my hands in plain sight. My grandmother had a white handkerchief in her glovebox. If she broke down, she would tie it to the antenna and sit in her car with her hand on her little .25.

Its all a judgement call. Running up to a cop in a shootout is most likely to get me shot. By the cop or the BG. Not good. Taking out the BG with my car is an option, as stated before. Giving the LEO more cover with my car is another. Being a good witness is vital. If I can't safely stop, I'll find a place to observe and report from, in support of the operation. Deliberately walking into a gunfight is not what CHL is about, IMHO. If the officer is hit and the BG bugs out, I'll be there to get him whatever help I can.

To each his own, as long as it doesn't interfere with me or mine.....

I will respect the officer that stops me, I will be polite and professional, as I hope he/she will be. I will not make any move to escalate the situation and will be cooperative as best possible without letting my opinions get the best of me or being confrontational. If he/she wants to act like a goofball, opinionated know it all, that's fine. I won't lose my professionalism and will handle it calmly. If I file a complaint later, it will be knowing with absolute certaintly that it is justified.
User avatar

Captain Matt
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: blue water

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#74

Post by Captain Matt »

dicion wrote:
dac1842 wrote:
roberts wrote:As long as Gary Blankinship is their spokesman, I will keep on driving and mind my own business if I ever see a Houston cop in trouble. I don't want them to wet themselves if they observe my weapon. Or shoot me for trying to help.
You must be kidding me. If you observed an officer in trouble you would not stop?
:iagree:

I'm sorry, but I can't just drive by someone obviously in trouble, and need of help. Police officer or not.
I disagree. If a department or union is anti CHL then their members don't deserve our support, our help, or our respect. They want to create an us-vs-them division, then let them reap what they sow. :mad5
"hic sunt dracones"

DONT TREAD ON ME

Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law

#75

Post by DONT TREAD ON ME »

reference my sig
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”