As I stated, I don't remember any concern about Reagan, Bush or Clinton, but you have clearly stated your case to the contrary. I think I was probably too young then to really care too much about politics that much.Chip wrote:http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... 94347.htmlpdubyoo wrote:I don't remember there being any concern with Reagan, Bush or Clinton, from either side of the aisle, that there would be an attempt to use the forum to advance political agendas
when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue.
Unlike the Obama speech, in 1991 most of the controversy came after, not before, the president's school appearance. The day after Bush spoke, the Washington Post published a front-page story suggesting the speech was carefully staged for the president's political benefit. "The White House turned a Northwest Washington junior high classroom into a television studio and its students into props," the Post reported.
So, if there was an outcry then from Bush opponents, why is the left crying foul now when the conservatives are questioning Obama's motives? Sounds like another case of rediculous political posturing. Politicians are such hypocrits!