UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#76

Post by bdickens »

I saw in the Houston Comical today that Sen. Cornyn has issued a statement that he will vote "no" on Sotomayor. :thumbs2:
Byron Dickens
User avatar

Chip
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:48 pm
Location: Montgomery County

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#77

Post by Chip »

bdickens wrote:I saw in the Houston Comical today that Sen. Cornyn has issued a statement that he will vote "no" on Sotomayor. :thumbs2:
I got on Senator Cornyn's email distribution list when I sent him my thoughts on Cap and Trade. This email just came in from him :
Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held the confirmation hearing for Judge Sotomayor. I had the opportunity to ask Judge Sotomayor to explain some of her troubling past statements and her judicial philosophy to determine what kind of justice Judge Sotomayor would be if confirmed. Unfortunately, I cannot support Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation because she failed to convince me that, as a Supreme Court Justice, she will adhere to a restrained judicial philosophy that delivers fair, impartial, and equal justice for all. Issues of deep importance to Texans are sure to come before the Supreme Court in the coming years, like whether or not to weaken the Second Amendment right of Texans to keep and bear arms. I am also concerned that the Court will fail to protect the Fifth Amendment private property rights of Texans from cities and states that want to condemn their property for non-public uses, and that the Court will expand the right to abortion and other liberal social policies that appear nowhere in the Constitution.
Edit: With respect, let me refer you back to this thread. Cornyn at least appeared to go into the hearings with an open mind before deciding he wasn't going to support her appointment.
I will add, as a fifth circumstance in the situation of the House of Representatives, restraining them from oppressive measures, that they can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society. - J Madison, Federalist #57
User avatar

Topic author
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#78

Post by stevie_d_64 »

Drewthetexan wrote:
stevie_d_64 wrote:
Abraham wrote:No wonder the young are disgusted with our system.
And they are very susceptable to "progressive" and "empathetic" reasonings dispite the law, the Constitution and common sense...

Life experiences, emotions, social justice, etc etc...Those are the paths to destruction of civilized, logical and sensible society...

I am certainly not a perfect person...Yet I understand that I am totally responsible and accountable for my actions...Something seriously lacking in some of the yutes around the world today...
There is a phenomenon occuring now where the parents of today's youth are actually impeding their children's sense of responsibility and accountability. They are called helicopter parents because they constantly hover about their kids, making decisions for them, sheltering them, and keeping them from actually experiencing life the way it is - cruel, unforgiving, and relentless. more info here. Perhaps these parents need lessons in responsibility and accountability, particularly if they are to rely on the decisions of their children some time down the road?

I'd argue that life experiences are integral to good leadership. I believe that the framers of the Constitution also believed this, else why have age requirements to hold office? Life experience, amongst a host of other factors, gives us perspective. And the broader our perspective, regarding politics, the better equipped we are to make sound decisions concerning the wide range of your constituents' interests.

In the case of The SCOTUS, there is some insularity between the immediate interests of the people and a duty to uphold the Constitution. That's why they get lifetime appointments. But they still need some real, formative experience to help shape their views and understanding of the intent of what was written in the Constitution. If interpreting case law was an easy, cut and dried thing, we wouldn't have a supreme court.
I would agree that life experiences are integral to good leadership skills, only so much to be able to effectively carry on those duties and be able to mentor others to take on leadership responsibilities...

When it comes to making decisions like a judge though...Those emotions and experiences do not, and should not, be applied in any way shape or form to the duties you must be responsible and accountable for as a justice...

Considering all the cases she has presided over that have been overturned by higher courts, this is indicative of a poor application of "legal" precidence, and poor judgement...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar

Topic author
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#79

Post by stevie_d_64 »

bdickens wrote:I saw in the Houston Comical today that Sen. Cornyn has issued a statement that he will vote "no" on Sotomayor. :thumbs2:
Yes, his "no" vote is a good thing...But if you look closely at his statement he said he is doing so with great regret and sadness...

When I saw that yesterday it was very late in the day and no one was in his D.C. office or his local Houston district office to answer my question about why he is regretful and sad about this...

I am not impressed...I am sure him clarifying this concern I have will temper my dissapointment in the statement he made on this issue...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#80

Post by Liberty »

Drewthetexan wrote:
There is a phenomenon occuring now where the parents of today's youth are actually impeding their children's sense of responsibility and accountability. They are called helicopter parents because they constantly hover about their kids, making decisions for them, sheltering them, and keeping them from actually experiencing life the way it is - cruel, unforgiving, and relentless. more info here. Perhaps these parents need lessons in responsibility and accountability, particularly if they are to rely on the decisions of their children some time down the road?

.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
User avatar

pdubyoo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Spring, TX

Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

#81

Post by pdubyoo »

Well, it's another dark day in DC. She was confirmed, as expected. They plan to have her sworn-in by noon tomorrow. :banghead: :banghead:

EDIT: Cornyn and KBH did vote NO.
Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”