I was tied up away from the computer and missed the live hearing today. It's great though to be able come here and to see that a lawyer
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![thumbs2 :thumbs2:](./images/smilies/thumbsup2.gif)
Moderator: Charles L. Cotton
As I read Amendment 6, it merely affirms that preexisting restrictions on where firearms may be carried apply on college campuses as well, specifically referring to the sections regarding polling places, 51% establishments, and government meetings.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I need to see how Amendment 6 is worded to be able to answer your question.agbullet2k1 wrote:I don't think I've seen this addressed anywhere, but does anyone know how this would affect hospitals in partnership with universities that post 30.06? Would just the hospital part be off limits, with the classrooms being ok, or would the 30.06 no longer be valid?
Chas.
Also of interest may be the votes for/against the bill:(f) This section does not provide an exception to the application of or a defense to prosecution under Section 46.03(a)(2), 46.035(b)(1), or 46.035(c), Penal Code.
What do you notice about the A-rated Senators who didn't vote for the bill?hirundo82 wrote:As I read Amendment 6, it merely affirms that preexisting restrictions on where firearms may be carried apply on college campuses as well, specifically referring to the sections regarding polling places, 51% establishments, and government meetings.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I need to see how Amendment 6 is worded to be able to answer your question.agbullet2k1 wrote:I don't think I've seen this addressed anywhere, but does anyone know how this would affect hospitals in partnership with universities that post 30.06? Would just the hospital part be off limits, with the classrooms being ok, or would the 30.06 no longer be valid?
Chas.
Also of interest may be the votes for/against the bill:(f) This section does not provide an exception to the application of or a defense to prosecution under Section 46.03(a)(2), 46.035(b)(1), or 46.035(c), Penal Code.
Yeas: Carona, Deuell, Eltife, Estes, Fraser, Harris, Hegar, Hinojosa, Huffman,
Jackson, Lucio, Nelson, Nichols, Patrick, Seliger, Shapiro, Uresti, Wentworth,
Whitmire, Williams.
Nays: Averitt, Davis, Duncan, Ellis, Gallegos, Shapleigh, Van de Putte, Watson,
West, Zaffirini.
Absent-excused:Ogden.
Sen. Gallegos voted for with the "Yeas" to bring the bill to the floor for consideration (giving it the 21 votes needed) but then consistently voted against tabling the amendments and ultimately against passage--I'm not sure what to make of that.
You forgot Van Putte - UTSA (>20k students)Douva wrote:
What do you notice about the A-rated Senators who didn't vote for the bill?
They all have major universities in their districts (Averitt - Baylor, Duncan - Texas Tech, Ogden - A&M, Watson - UT).
Our opposition can flap their gums all they want about the "powerful gun lobby," but in Texas, nobody wields more political power than the universities.
Big donors to the schools tend to also donate to Republican candidates.txmatt wrote:So where was Ogden? Hope it was important...
I can't understand Senators in districts with major universities bowing to liberal academia that will never vote for them anyway (for the Republicans anyhow). And students are pretty much split on the issue of campus carry and most don't vote, so that can't be a reason.
I'll be calling his office asking the same question. I think its disgusting for senators who have the most reason to stand up for the rights of those in their districts to duck their responsibilities like this. Really representing our interests up there, aren't they?txmatt wrote:So where was Ogden? Hope it was important...
I can't understand Senators in districts with major universities bowing to liberal academia that will never vote for them anyway (for the Republicans anyhow). And students are pretty much split on the issue of campus carry and most don't vote, so that can't be a reason.
It passed. Time to start working the House.Douva wrote:They're voting now.
Why is that, considering that non-teaching hospitals aren't exempt?Charles L. Cotton wrote:SB1164 passed on a 19 to 12 vote with one amendment exempting "teaching" hospitals.
Chas.
Hospitals are still allowed to post 30.06 though. I'm guessing that the amendment was added to avoid confusion.tornado wrote:Why is that, considering that non-teaching hospitals aren't exempt?Charles L. Cotton wrote:SB1164 passed on a 19 to 12 vote with one amendment exempting "teaching" hospitals.
Chas.