is this the oppinion of the whole NRA?
Moderator: carlson1
-
Topic author - Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 7:28 am
- Location: w. houston
is this the oppinion of the whole NRA?
i dont know if this is the proper forum for this so i appologize ahead of time. and if this is a repost i appologize aswell.
one of my regular shooting buddies came across this and sent it to me... it made my blood boil.
http://www.klru.org/texasmonthlytalks/a ... ackson.asp
watch the very last clip.
one of my regular shooting buddies came across this and sent it to me... it made my blood boil.
http://www.klru.org/texasmonthlytalks/a ... ackson.asp
watch the very last clip.
"live with honor, and let not your death be born by the pallbearers of disgrace, cruelty, weekness, and fear." - Justin Smith in a letter to Lt. Col. Dave Grossman
TXDPSA
TXDPSA
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: The part of Texas that isn't like Texas
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1281
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:15 pm
- Location: Katy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:30 am
- Location: Humble
He is entitled to his opinion, but I disagree with him. His book, One Ranger, is a pretty good read and he was at the NRA convention last year.
In my opinion, his ideas regarding weapon capacity is a generational thing for some. In his book, he describes himself as someone who always worked with firearms, but was not a "gun person". They were implements of his trade, and he was still carrying a 1911 and a Winchester rifle into the early 90's when on duty.
Many people view "high capacity" as any handgun that carries more than +/- 7 rounds (revolver and 1911) or a rifle that carries more than 10 rounds (M1 Garand). These definitions are a carryover from the WWII generation that have been reinforced for the last 50+ years by the media.
In my opinion, his ideas regarding weapon capacity is a generational thing for some. In his book, he describes himself as someone who always worked with firearms, but was not a "gun person". They were implements of his trade, and he was still carrying a 1911 and a Winchester rifle into the early 90's when on duty.
Many people view "high capacity" as any handgun that carries more than +/- 7 rounds (revolver and 1911) or a rifle that carries more than 10 rounds (M1 Garand). These definitions are a carryover from the WWII generation that have been reinforced for the last 50+ years by the media.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
I feel that the NRA is about much more than magazine capacity and everything that it speaks out about publicly is symbolic of something much bigger. Each action against gun rights and liberties is merely a precursor to what the anti-gun movement will be fighting for next year. It is already established that people want their guns....the last election for president proved that, so why not win a few battles and limit people until the point of disgusting them!
I have to agree with some of you guys that it ticked me off to watch this (again).
Everyone has their opinion, but when you are representing thousands and thousands of membership paying folks......you should really keep the mouth shut about limiting rights that an organization you represent has spent millions of our dollars lobbying for! Just doesn't make good sense to me...
I have to agree with some of you guys that it ticked me off to watch this (again).
Everyone has their opinion, but when you are representing thousands and thousands of membership paying folks......you should really keep the mouth shut about limiting rights that an organization you represent has spent millions of our dollars lobbying for! Just doesn't make good sense to me...
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:41 am
- Location: Galveston, Texas
- Contact:
Surely his opinions in regard to assault weapons and magazine capacity were not made public before his election to the NRA board.
Now that he has publically stated his opinion, and given that it is in direct conflict with the NRA's "entire orientation and agenda", then he should resign his position on the board.
Now that he has publically stated his opinion, and given that it is in direct conflict with the NRA's "entire orientation and agenda", then he should resign his position on the board.
Texas CHL Instructor
Paralegal Division-State Bar Of Texas
NREMT
Paralegal Division-State Bar Of Texas
NREMT
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
I hope you guys understand that as a member of the NRA Board of Directors, I cannot comment on this issue, as I must be cognizant that anything I say may be viewed in my official capacity as a representative of the NRA, and not merely an expression of my personal opinion.gigag04 wrote:<~~~~~~~~ anxiously awaiting Chas' response.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 5474
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
- Location: Houston
Very wise. Oh wellCharles L. Cotton wrote:I hope you guys understand that as a member of the NRA Board of Directors, I cannot comment on this issue, as I must be cognizant that anything I say may be viewed in my official capacity as a representative of the NRA, and not merely an expression of my personal opinion.gigag04 wrote:<~~~~~~~~ anxiously awaiting Chas' response.
Chas.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Then can you comment on the rudeness of wearing one's hat indoors? I thought at least the NRA would push for some rules of decorum among its board members.Charles L. Cotton wrote: I hope you guys understand that as a member of the NRA Board of Directors, I cannot comment on this issue, as I must be cognizant that anything I say may be viewed in my official capacity as a representative of the NRA, and not merely an expression of my personal opinion.
Chas.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Huh?KD5NRH wrote:Then can you comment on the rudeness of wearing one's hat indoors? I thought at least the NRA would push for some rules of decorum among its board members.Charles L. Cotton wrote: I hope you guys understand that as a member of the NRA Board of Directors, I cannot comment on this issue, as I must be cognizant that anything I say may be viewed in my official capacity as a representative of the NRA, and not merely an expression of my personal opinion.
Chas.
Chas.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:50 pm
- Location: Tx