Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


lunchbox
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 28
Posts: 1266
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: San Angelo

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#61

Post by lunchbox »

all in all it would seem that there is no hope
common sence is well not so common anymore and the day of the good ole boy has passed
"I have two guns. One for each of ya" Doc Holiday
"Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave."
"forgiveness is between them and god its my job to arrange the meeting" man on fire

Topic author
centex aggie
Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Cen Tex
Contact:

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#62

Post by centex aggie »

lunchbox wrote:all in all it would seem that there is no hope
common sence is well not so common anymore and the day of the good ole boy has passed
and it will get worse before it gets better especially if the dems get that 70 person lead in the House

Disabled U.S. Army Veteran 94'-98'
NRA Life Member

Greg

amber
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: texas

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#63

Post by amber »

KC5AV wrote:
amber wrote:
frankie_the_yankee wrote: But in case you are right, I will now use the thread to point out that all those absolutist assertions about the 2A are a mass of legal and constitutional baloney. That they are supported by no court , constitutional scholars, or case law. Nor will they ever be supported by any court, constitutional scholar or case law. And the reason for that is that, like all other "unlimited" rights, they lead to absurd conclusions that society would never want and would never support. (I'm just waiting for the 2A to reach its "correct" status. I want to set up a string of vending machines selling MP-5's at the loading gates of our major airports.
Thank you for being the voice of reason and saying why we need stronger controls on assault weapons.
What exactly is an assault weapon? I've never seen one of those.
You're not looking hard enough. I see them at every gun show.

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5299
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#64

Post by srothstein »

amber wrote:
KC5AV wrote:What exactly is an assault weapon? I've never seen one of those.
You're not looking hard enough. I see them at every gun show.
I sincerely doubt it. I have never yet seen any automatic weapons at any gun shows. Given the approximately six month delay that it takes for ATF to approve the transfer, they are not going to sell too many at traveling gun shows. And given the $20,000 price for each (my personal estimate of the average), I sincerely doubt that you will find too many buyers at a gun show where they are looking for bargains.

And before you jump in with the mythical gun show loophole, assault weapons (automatic firearms) require ATF approval and a background check before they can be transferred, even if it is a face to face between two individuals.
Steve Rothstein

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#65

Post by mr surveyor »

never have a battle of wits with the unarmed!
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar

boomerang
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#66

Post by boomerang »

srothstein wrote:I sincerely doubt it. I have never yet seen any automatic weapons at any gun shows. Given the approximately six month delay that it takes for ATF to approve the transfer, they are not going to sell too many at traveling gun shows. And given the $20,000 price for each (my personal estimate of the average), I sincerely doubt that you will find too many buyers at a gun show where they are looking for bargains.
I stopped going to gun shows because of the 30.06 nonsense but I used to see Class 3 dealers at the big shows in Houston. They always had huge "DO NOT TOUCH!" signs but it was fun looking at what they brought.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"

CHL/LEO
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:26 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#67

Post by CHL/LEO »

I sincerely doubt it. I have never yet seen any automatic weapons at any gun shows.
Steve, there's usually one or two Class 3 dealers with full-auto weapons at the Dallas Market Hall shows.
"Conflict is inevitable; Combat is an option."

Life Member - NRA/TSRA/GOA
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#68

Post by jimlongley »

amber wrote:
KC5AV wrote:What exactly is an assault weapon? I've never seen one of those.
You're not looking hard enough. I see them at every gun show.
I'm with KC5AV, I have been to a lot of gun shows, and have seen all manner of guns including class three, but have yet to see any assault weapons.

Perhaps, Amber, you meant your comment as subtle irony, or have you fallen prey to media/political hype and believe that there is actually some such thing?

The term "assault weapon" has no strict standard defintion, unlike assault rifle, submachine gun, machine pistol, or machine gun, it is a term coined by unknown persons, most likely the brady bunch, in response to outcry by those who know better against the constant description of certain firearms as assault rifles.

Whoever coined the term just chose one with enough pejorative nuance to put fear into the hearts of the unknowing and never bothered, probably by design, to provide an adequate definition. Without said definition the users of the phrase can call anything an assault weapon and no one can hold them responsible for their words - so a black military looking pistol becomes an "ASSAULT WEAPON" as does a semi-automatic (doesn't fit the definition of assault rifle) version of a current or past military gun.

The term's amorphous nature makes it virtually useless for anything beyond rabble rousers trying to stir emotional responses among the unknowing ("Save society, outlaw assault weapons") and is hardly a suitable part of a gun owner's lexicon, except for re-education of those who have fallen prey to the hype.

[/rant]
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#69

Post by mr surveyor »

I have a feeling that our young poster is not as naieve as she may appear to be.
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!

Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#70

Post by Mike1951 »

mr surveyor wrote:I have a feeling that our young poster is not as naieve as she may appear to be.
Nothing but a troll!!
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member

lunchbox
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 28
Posts: 1266
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: San Angelo

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#71

Post by lunchbox »

Mike1951 wrote:
mr surveyor wrote:I have a feeling that our young poster is not as naieve as she may appear to be.
Nothing but a troll!!


someone please explain as i am lost as to what you are talking about
"I have two guns. One for each of ya" Doc Holiday
"Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave."
"forgiveness is between them and god its my job to arrange the meeting" man on fire

Darwood
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:20 pm

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#72

Post by Darwood »

lunchbox wrote:
Mike1951 wrote:
mr surveyor wrote:I have a feeling that our young poster is not as naieve as she may appear to be.
Nothing but a troll!!


someone please explain as i am lost as to what you are talking about
Internet Troll

The term is thought to come from the act of "trolling for suckers".

Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#73

Post by Mike1951 »

A troll is someone who joins a forum or list only to cause trouble and dissention.

From her posts, Amber shares little of what this list is about.

She could possibly be naively ignorant regarding RKBA and I think that is why she has been tolerated this long.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member

lunchbox
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 28
Posts: 1266
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: San Angelo

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#74

Post by lunchbox »

RKBA???
"I have two guns. One for each of ya" Doc Holiday
"Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave."
"forgiveness is between them and god its my job to arrange the meeting" man on fire

Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: Prior suspension of 2nd Amendment Rights questions

#75

Post by Mike1951 »

Sorry, Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”