New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Moderator: carlson1
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 3532
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
- Location: SE Texas
New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
LCP = Lightweight Compact Pistol
http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/ ... ype=Pistol
http://www.downrange.tv/shotshow2008/?p=11
If it proves reliable, this is going to really sell.
http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/ ... ype=Pistol
http://www.downrange.tv/shotshow2008/?p=11
If it proves reliable, this is going to really sell.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:34 pm
- Location: Bryan/College Station
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I would certainly agree. It it proves as reliable as my P3AT, I will most likely buy one once they become easily available (might take a year or two). Don't really need one, but having a BUG for the BUG is a good enough reason for me.....Mike1951 wrote: If it proves reliable, this is going to really sell.
PhilR.
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
That looks nice. I'll trade my keltec for a ruger any day.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.
Anygun
Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 3532
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
- Location: SE Texas
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I must be overlooking something. I see no internal lock. It just comes with a padlock.anygunanywhere wrote:I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Looks alot like a p3-at with a slide lock. Daddy likes!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Plano, TX
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
It looks like it may be a bit wider and a bit taller. Perhaps I'll be able to get two fingers on this one.
I found the exploded parts view and it looks identical to the Kel-Tec. With a little luck the fit and finish will be better and there will be fewer problems out of the box.
Tom
I found the exploded parts view and it looks identical to the Kel-Tec. With a little luck the fit and finish will be better and there will be fewer problems out of the box.
Tom
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I'm not doing very well today. Mike1951 is shooting me full of holes.Mike1951 wrote:I must be overlooking something. I see no internal lock. It just comes with a padlock.anygunanywhere wrote:I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.
I surrender.
Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I like a-lot. I may get that to replace my P-3AT =). They must have an agreement or something kel-tec. That looks like an upgraded copy of the kel-tec............
Now if they can just copy the PF-9 and make a better version of it.......
Never thought about buying a ruger pistol (except 22lr) until now.
Now if they can just copy the PF-9 and make a better version of it.......
Never thought about buying a ruger pistol (except 22lr) until now.
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
While it shares some features with the KT, it also has some significant differences. Over at KTOG.org, they have side-by-side exploded diagrams. Some parts are almost identical, but others are very different.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:23 pm
- Location: Hill Country
- Contact:
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Sweeeeet.
I don't think I'll get one, but who knows.
I can't make myself invest in holsters for my .380s as long as I have 9x19 pistols that are as small or smaller.
I had fired a KT once and really didn't enjoy it enough to be useful with it.
I don't think I'll get one, but who knows.
I can't make myself invest in holsters for my .380s as long as I have 9x19 pistols that are as small or smaller.
I had fired a KT once and really didn't enjoy it enough to be useful with it.
What is Project One Million: Texas?
The "Project" is a grassroots effort to increase the number of Texans who are members of the National Rifle Association from 250.000 to 1,000,000.
http://www.projectonemilliontexas.com/
The "Project" is a grassroots effort to increase the number of Texans who are members of the National Rifle Association from 250.000 to 1,000,000.
http://www.projectonemilliontexas.com/
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Plano, TX
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
I studied those charts and can't find too many differences. They exploded it differently but when you compare the majority of the parts they are very close. Perhaps KT has an agreement with them. I don't know much about copyright laws. If they can control the quality and fit & finish they should have a hit at that price point.KBCraig wrote:While it shares some features with the KT, it also has some significant differences. Over at KTOG.org, they have side-by-side exploded diagrams. Some parts are almost identical, but others are very different.
Tom
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
- Location: Denton County
- Contact:
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Quote: "I don't know much about copyright laws."
Patents, if such exist by Kel-Tec, are probably stronger. But, I doubt Ruger would be going forward in this manner if there was a problem with possible litigation. And if there was litigation, Ruger likely in a much better financial position to duke it out ...
Yep, if the little gun proves to be reliable, Ruger probably has a winner there. But I'd rather see one in 9mm - where Kahr could have some more legitimate competition.
Patents, if such exist by Kel-Tec, are probably stronger. But, I doubt Ruger would be going forward in this manner if there was a problem with possible litigation. And if there was litigation, Ruger likely in a much better financial position to duke it out ...
Yep, if the little gun proves to be reliable, Ruger probably has a winner there. But I'd rather see one in 9mm - where Kahr could have some more legitimate competition.
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Plano, TX
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Greybeard wrote:Patents, if such exist by Kel-Tec, are probably stronger. But, I doubt Ruger would be going forward in this manner if there was a problem with possible litigation. And if there was litigation, Ruger likely in a much better financial position to duke it out ...
Wrong choice of words again. I have to stop posting so early in the morning! I agree with you that Ruger most likely did their research and has deeper pockets in case Kel Tec files.
I'l looking forward to getting my hands on one!
Tom
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)
Did Ruger clone the KelTec P-3AT under license, or is this an original design?
The .380 being of rather low velocity with questionable expansion characteristics, at least from a 2.5 inch barrel, I would have much rather seen Ruger introduce a small scale semi-auto for it's new personal defense .327 round.
The .380 being of rather low velocity with questionable expansion characteristics, at least from a 2.5 inch barrel, I would have much rather seen Ruger introduce a small scale semi-auto for it's new personal defense .327 round.