New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#1

Post by Mike1951 »

LCP = Lightweight Compact Pistol

http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/ ... ype=Pistol

http://www.downrange.tv/shotshow2008/?p=11

If it proves reliable, this is going to really sell.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member

PhilR.
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Bryan/College Station

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#2

Post by PhilR. »

Mike1951 wrote: If it proves reliable, this is going to really sell.
I would certainly agree. It it proves as reliable as my P3AT, I will most likely buy one once they become easily available (might take a year or two). Don't really need one, but having a BUG for the BUG is a good enough reason for me.....

PhilR.

KRM45
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: DFW

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#3

Post by KRM45 »

That looks nice. I'll trade my keltec for a ruger any day.
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7875
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#4

Post by anygunanywhere »

I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.

Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

Topic author
Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#5

Post by Mike1951 »

anygunanywhere wrote:I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.
I must be overlooking something. I see no internal lock. It just comes with a padlock.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member

dwsUSA
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:32 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#6

Post by dwsUSA »

Looks alot like a p3-at with a slide lock. Daddy likes!

tbranch
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#7

Post by tbranch »

It looks like it may be a bit wider and a bit taller. Perhaps I'll be able to get two fingers on this one.

I found the exploded parts view and it looks identical to the Kel-Tec. With a little luck the fit and finish will be better and there will be fewer problems out of the box.

Tom
Image
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7875
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#8

Post by anygunanywhere »

Mike1951 wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:I see they have all of the Brady locking garbage. My KTs don't.
I must be overlooking something. I see no internal lock. It just comes with a padlock.
I'm not doing very well today. Mike1951 is shooting me full of holes.

I surrender.

Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

Boma
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:29 am

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#9

Post by Boma »

I like a-lot. I may get that to replace my P-3AT =). They must have an agreement or something kel-tec. That looks like an upgraded copy of the kel-tec............

Now if they can just copy the PF-9 and make a better version of it.......

Never thought about buying a ruger pistol (except 22lr) until now.

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#10

Post by KBCraig »

While it shares some features with the KT, it also has some significant differences. Over at KTOG.org, they have side-by-side exploded diagrams. Some parts are almost identical, but others are very different.

Hyunchback
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:23 pm
Location: Hill Country
Contact:

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#11

Post by Hyunchback »

Sweeeeet. :drool:

I don't think I'll get one, but who knows.

I can't make myself invest in holsters for my .380s as long as I have 9x19 pistols that are as small or smaller.

I had fired a KT once and really didn't enjoy it enough to be useful with it.
What is Project One Million: Texas?
The "Project" is a grassroots effort to increase the number of Texans who are members of the National Rifle Association from 250.000 to 1,000,000.
http://www.projectonemilliontexas.com/

tbranch
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#12

Post by tbranch »

KBCraig wrote:While it shares some features with the KT, it also has some significant differences. Over at KTOG.org, they have side-by-side exploded diagrams. Some parts are almost identical, but others are very different.
I studied those charts and can't find too many differences. They exploded it differently but when you compare the majority of the parts they are very close. Perhaps KT has an agreement with them. I don't know much about copyright laws. If they can control the quality and fit & finish they should have a hit at that price point.

Tom
Image

Greybeard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Denton County
Contact:

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#13

Post by Greybeard »

Quote: "I don't know much about copyright laws."

Patents, if such exist by Kel-Tec, are probably stronger. But, I doubt Ruger would be going forward in this manner if there was a problem with possible litigation. And if there was litigation, Ruger likely in a much better financial position to duke it out ...

Yep, if the little gun proves to be reliable, Ruger probably has a winner there. But I'd rather see one in 9mm - where Kahr could have some more legitimate competition. ;-)
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"

tbranch
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#14

Post by tbranch »

Greybeard wrote:Patents, if such exist by Kel-Tec, are probably stronger. But, I doubt Ruger would be going forward in this manner if there was a problem with possible litigation. And if there was litigation, Ruger likely in a much better financial position to duke it out ...
:iagree:

Wrong choice of words again. I have to stop posting so early in the morning! I agree with you that Ruger most likely did their research and has deeper pockets in case Kel Tec files.

I'l looking forward to getting my hands on one!

Tom
Image

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: New Ruger .380 (think P-3AT)

#15

Post by casingpoint »

Did Ruger clone the KelTec P-3AT under license, or is this an original design?

The .380 being of rather low velocity with questionable expansion characteristics, at least from a 2.5 inch barrel, I would have much rather seen Ruger introduce a small scale semi-auto for it's new personal defense .327 round. :headscratch
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”