US military switching back to .45ACP sidearm

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6658
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

US military switching back to .45ACP sidearm

#1

Post by Paladin »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Combat_Pistol

A new cross-service US military sidearm called Joint Combat Pistol (JCP) is in the works.

The 'Combat Pistol System' is to consist of:
-a Caliber .45 pistol
-Magazines (standard and high-capacity);
-Suppressor Attachment Kit
-Holster
-Magazine Holder (standard and high-capacity)
-Cleaning Kit and Operator's Manual.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

Kalrog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Leander, TX
Contact:

#2

Post by Kalrog »

When you are limited to FMJ - take the biggest FMJ you can get. Especially if concealment isn't a big deal.

If our troops had access to good JHP ammo - I doubt the 9mm would be such a poor choice.
User avatar

jbirds1210
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
Location: Texas City, Texas

#3

Post by jbirds1210 »

+1! I bet good 9MM ammo would be cheaper than .45 ball. It is hard to argue that a good 45 will always do the trick....but you can't load your gun with the other sides ammo if it is a .45.
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member

"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
User avatar

MikeJ
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: Clear Lake, TX

#4

Post by MikeJ »

While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
"Never send a man where you can send a bullet." - Winston Churchill in A Roving Commission
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

#5

Post by gigag04 »

MikeJ wrote:While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
Have you ever shot anyone with a .223? It's not as much of a slouch as you would think. Unfortunately my best friend in Iraq has had to "take casualties" and the M-4/M-16 did the trick every time.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar

MikeJ
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: Clear Lake, TX

#6

Post by MikeJ »

Did my military service entirely in CONUS, so I've never shot anybody. I've just been hearing and reading that the reviews on the M4/M16 are mixed. The official opinion, of course, is that the 5.56 is the deadliest round in history, but the Army has considered adopting the new 6.8mm SPC cartridge, at least for special forces. The 6.8 is supposed to give the rifle better range and terminal ballistics while replacing only the barrel, bolt, and magazine. Somebody who's shot people with the poodle shooter must be dissatisfied with it.
"Never send a man where you can send a bullet." - Winston Churchill in A Roving Commission

Arock
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:48 pm
Location: Rockwall

#7

Post by Arock »

The 6.8 is a non-starter. Only market is gonna be Rambo wanna-be's.
We remember the Alamo because against long odds we were forced give up one building.
Mexico remembers Texas.
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

#8

Post by jimlongley »

MikeJ wrote:While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
Or better yet, .30-06?
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

Arock
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:48 pm
Location: Rockwall

#9

Post by Arock »

jimlongley wrote:
MikeJ wrote:While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
Or better yet, .30-06?
.30-06? Weenie-beanie.

.45-70, a real man's cartridge.

:grin:

Next?
We remember the Alamo because against long odds we were forced give up one building.
Mexico remembers Texas.
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

#10

Post by gigag04 »

SF has been using the .458 SOCOM round for a while in thier 14.5" M-4s.

I've even seen some ODA guys running around with 10" .458s.

All you need is a different upper and you have it, but I would say between the "poodle shooter" and the .458 you should be fine.

I've seen .308 uppers as well.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison

Arock
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:48 pm
Location: Rockwall

#11

Post by Arock »

gigag04 wrote:I've seen .308 uppers as well.
A .308 upper will not fit on an AR15 lower receiver. Magwell is too short.

AR-pattern rifles firing .308 are larger than AR15/M16. They are AR10/SR25 etc. DPMS and Bushmaster both also sell .308 rifles.
We remember the Alamo because against long odds we were forced give up one building.
Mexico remembers Texas.
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

#12

Post by jimlongley »

Arock wrote:
jimlongley wrote:
MikeJ wrote:While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
Or better yet, .30-06?
.30-06? Weenie-beanie.

.45-70, a real man's cartridge.

:grin:

Next?
Well, we could go all the way up to .50BMG, but at least there are pistols chambered in .45-70, so I could go for that. :lol:
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

Bubba
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

#13

Post by Bubba »

Arock wrote:
jimlongley wrote:
MikeJ wrote:While they're at it, why not dump the 5.56 x 45mm poodle shooter and go back to 7.62 x 51mm?
Or better yet, .30-06?
.30-06? Weenie-beanie.

.45-70, a real man's cartridge.

:grin:

Next?
The SW500 is a handfull of gun !!!

:)
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

#14

Post by jimlongley »

"The SW500 is a handfull of gun !!!"

Don't I know it - I fired a friend's and drew blood on my hand from the recoil - no bruise, just blood seeping out of my hand about one inch square.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7876
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

#15

Post by anygunanywhere »

I know this is off topic, and not intended to hijack the thread, but my son sent me this last week. Not sure if it is true, but I LMAO after I read it.


December 9, 2005 (CNN)


While interviewing an anonymous US Special Forces soldier on his
sniper skills, a Reuters News agent asked the soldier what he felt when
shooting members of al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

The soldier shrugged and replied, "Recoil."


Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”