SCOTUS

[philip964]

Draft was leaked, very damaging to trust in court.

[Chemist45]

Nah.
Declaring legislation a tax when it clearly is not a tax but a penalty is damaging to trust in the court.

[anygunanywhere]

The baby killers and pedos are freaking out.

[Paladin]

The baby killers and pedos are freaking out.

This. They are going to claim the sky is falling.

The sky is falling, but not for the reasons the baby killers and pedos claim:

Brookings: Low birth rates and below replacement level fertility rates in the U.S. are probably here to stay for the foreseeable future.

This analysis implies that U.S. fertility rates are likely to be considerably below replacement levels for the foreseeable future. This is driven by more than a decade of falling birth rates and declining births at all ages for multiple cohorts of women, not simply the aftermath of the pandemic-induced reduction in births. Furthermore, the simulated fertility rates we report in this essay are similar to those observed in virtually all other high-income countries. This evidence leads us to expect that U.S. birth rates and total completed fertility rates are not likely to rebound any time soon.

If we wish to persist as a species, killing babies is the wrong move.

[OneGun]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

[K.Mooneyham]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

That's the EXACT reason it was done. The Democrats' terrible ideology & policies caused the economic mess, the border mess, the crime mess, etc, and they therefore cannot run on those things. They've played out the race card, and their other "social issues" like the trans stuff have proven to not be winning hands. So, all they can do is try and rile up their base voters. Democrat voters have proven that they love abortion, so that's a primary motivation to get them to the polls. Then, it's all about the spin which the Democrats' mass news media, Hollywood, and social media machines will amplify for them.

[powerboatr]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

That's the EXACT reason it was done. The Democrats' terrible ideology & policies caused the economic mess, the border mess, the crime mess, etc, and they therefore cannot run on those things. They've played out the race card, and their other "social issues" like the trans stuff have proven to not be winning hands. So, all they can do is try and rile up their base voters. Democrat voters have proven that they love abortion, so that's a primary motivation to get them to the polls. Then, it's all about the spin which the Democrats' mass news media, Hollywood, and social media machines will amplify for them.

bingo was him name
pretty easy to see it was planned

i have ask what they meant by post birth abortions?? inst that hmmm murder or assassination of a live person

[Flightmare]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

I am hesitant to believe that it was intended to influence the mid-term elections. Here's my logic;

The SCOTUS opinion on these cases would have been released by July at the latest (end of the current SCOTUS session). This is well before the general election in November. Therefore, leaking the information now, or letting it come out thru the normal process would have generated the same result.

I offer the following alternative theory;

This leak was an attempt to influence one or more justices that were barely in the majority of supporting overturning Roe V Wade. The opinion and vote count is not official yet and is subject to change. The leaker may have hoped that public pressure could sway the single vote needed to flip the opinion and uphold Roe V Wade.

[mayor]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

I am hesitant to believe that it was intended to influence the mid-term elections. Here's my logic;

The SCOTUS opinion on these cases would have been released by July at the latest (end of the current SCOTUS session). This is well before the general election in November. Therefore, leaking the information now, or letting it come out thru the normal process would have generated the same result.

I offer the following alternative theory;

This leak was an attempt to influence one or more justices that were barely in the majority of supporting overturning Roe V Wade. The opinion and vote count is not official yet and is subject to change. The leaker may have hoped that public pressure could sway the single vote needed to flip the opinion and uphold Roe V Wade.

I like the squishy justice senario. Influncing the election is bonus points because, this will.

[Paladin]

The deep-state is now attacking SCOTUS!

I believe this was done to influence the mid-term elections!

I am hesitant to believe that it was intended to influence the mid-term elections. Here's my logic;

The SCOTUS opinion on these cases would have been released by July at the latest (end of the current SCOTUS session). This is well before the general election in November. Therefore, leaking the information now, or letting it come out thru the normal process would have generated the same result.

I offer the following alternative theory;

This leak was an attempt to influence one or more justices that were barely in the majority of supporting overturning Roe V Wade. The opinion and vote count is not official yet and is subject to change. The leaker may have hoped that public pressure could sway the single vote needed to flip the opinion and uphold Roe V Wade.

That's the rumor I'm hearing

[AF-Odin]

I believe that Flightmare has hit the nail on the head. This is an attempt to garner enough attention and dissent to cause one of the Justices to possibly change their vote. However, I really do not believe that will not happen. What NEEDS to happen is for Roberts to ferret out who the leaker is and if it is a staffer and not one of the Justices, the staffer needs to be immediately fired. If it was one of the Justices, the Chief Justice needs to censure the offender. Supreme Court deliberations are supposed to be private. One scholar I was listening to today stated that this has only occurred twice in well over 100 years. the first was in 1919 and the second was in 1973 regarding the initial RvW ruling.

[wheelgun1958]

I believe that Flightmare has hit the nail on the head. This is an attempt to garner enough attention and dissent to cause one of the Justices to possibly change their vote. However, I really do not believe that will not happen. What NEEDS to happen is for Roberts to ferret out who the leaker is and if it is a staffer and not one of the Justices, the staffer needs to be immediately fired. If it was one of the Justices, the Chief Justice needs to censure the offender. Supreme Court deliberations are supposed to be private. One scholar I was listening to today stated that this has only occurred twice in well over 100 years. the first was in 1919 and the second was in 1973 regarding the initial RvW ruling.

If a staffer, needs to be imprisoned without bail in isolation until trial in a couple years. If a justice, needs to be impeached and removed then the same fate as the staffer.

[chamberc]

I believe that Flightmare has hit the nail on the head. This is an attempt to garner enough attention and dissent to cause one of the Justices to possibly change their vote. However, I really do not believe that will not happen. What NEEDS to happen is for Roberts to ferret out who the leaker is and if it is a staffer and not one of the Justices, the staffer needs to be immediately fired. If it was one of the Justices, the Chief Justice needs to censure the offender. Supreme Court deliberations are supposed to be private. One scholar I was listening to today stated that this has only occurred twice in well over 100 years. the first was in 1919 and the second was in 1973 regarding the initial RvW ruling.

Roberts is most likely to change his vote to uphold the law in question, but not overturn Roe v Wade.

[philip964]

White House encourages 'peaceful protests,' won't tell abortion activists to avoid SCOTUS justices' homes

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white- ... tice-homes

Leftist’s doxed the fives home addresses.

[wheelgun1958]

White House encourages 'peaceful protests,' won't tell abortion activists to avoid SCOTUS justices' homes

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white- ... tice-homes

Leftist’s doxed the fives home addresses.

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507