IIRC, there's been some ruling about being allowed to record public servants without getting their permission.BSHII wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:32 amThe answer to the second Tweeter's question is "Yes," of course. California law only requires two-party consent to record confidential communications. A "confidential communication" is "any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering . . . or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded." Walking around in someone else's business is not a "confidential communication," and a business owner certainly does not need guests' consent to record surveillance footage in her own business.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:06 am Nancy Pelosi caught on business security camera violating California law shuttering hair salons, without wearing a mask:
Politico's reporting on it: did the salon break California law by videotaping someone without their consent? You can’t make this kind of comedy gold up.
Not sure whether that requires "on the job" to be valid...
Either way..... That particular Genie is out of the bottle.
I dare you to bring charges against the salon owner... That would be interesting.
