Is swearing at an toilet disorderly conduct???
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:45 am
When i was in law enforcement in kansas we had an enforceable ordinance called disturbing the peace by use of profanity,but police officers couldn't cite ppl it had to be a citizens complaint due to the fact they expected police officers to be a little thicker skinned than joe blow.At least that's the way our DA looked at it
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
I have heard that forever, even here in Texas. What strikes me is that there is no 'disturbing the peace" offense in Texas. There is disorderly conduct, and a cop certainly can be the complainant.Penn wrote:Yep - a cops peace can't be disturbed. I guess because there never really is any to disturb.
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5305
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Thanks TXI. I have heard for years that cops cannot be the complainant on disorderly conducted because we are not supposed to be able to be offended (most of the clauses require that). Even after I show Court of Criminal Appeals cases that say we can, I still get old otherwise.
I am glad to find someone who agrees with me that a peace officer can be the complainant in Texas for disorderly conduct.
I am glad to find someone who agrees with me that a peace officer can be the complainant in Texas for disorderly conduct.
Steve Rothstein
TXI, Steve, you'll probably both enjoy this one:
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
I've never enforced the law in TX, and I was responding to the post referenciing Kansas practices. I know for a fact that it is the law in California that a police officer can't have his "peace disturbed". So it's not strictly an urban legend.txinvestigator wrote:I have heard that forever, even here in Texas. What strikes me is that there is no 'disturbing the peace" offense in Texas. There is disorderly conduct, and a cop certainly can be the complainant.Penn wrote:Yep - a cops peace can't be disturbed. I guess because there never really is any to disturb.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
That is interesting. I like to keep up with things, so could you show me that law for California. I appreciate it.Penn wrote:I've never enforced the law in TX, and I was responding to the post referenciing Kansas practices. I know for a fact that it is the law in California that a police officer can't have his "peace disturbed". So it's not strictly an urban legend.txinvestigator wrote:I have heard that forever, even here in Texas. What strikes me is that there is no 'disturbing the peace" offense in Texas. There is disorderly conduct, and a cop certainly can be the complainant.Penn wrote:Yep - a cops peace can't be disturbed. I guess because there never really is any to disturb.
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
Well - I did a quick search and couldn't find the actual statute, but I did find a couple CA PD web sites that have FAQ sections. Disturbing the peace is one of the FAQ's. Here are the links:
http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/police/FAQ/ ... _peace.htm
http://ci.irvine.ca.us/ipd/info_center/police_faq6.asp
I'll try to find the actual statute later.
http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/police/FAQ/ ... _peace.htm
http://ci.irvine.ca.us/ipd/info_center/police_faq6.asp
I'll try to find the actual statute later.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
That one brought a tear of joy to my eye...KBCraig wrote:TXI, Steve, you'll probably both enjoy this one:
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
I may be an instigator of hate and discontent, but at least I know that if I do, I need to be prepared mentally and physically for the consequences...
That is a lesson this young guy found out real quick...
"Lawdog" really knows how to make my day...Thanks for the story Mr. K!!!
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
Thank you.Penn wrote:Well - I did a quick search and couldn't find the actual statute, but I did find a couple CA PD web sites that have FAQ sections. Disturbing the peace is one of the FAQ's. Here are the links:
http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/police/FAQ/ ... _peace.htm
http://ci.irvine.ca.us/ipd/info_center/police_faq6.asp
I'll try to find the actual statute later.
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
LOL... that's a new one on me. I know a few people that will appreciate that tip.KBCraig wrote:TXI, Steve, you'll probably both enjoy this one:
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
Other interesting tickets I've seen:
Dude hanging out the window - improper cargo loading
Vehicle with modified Lamborghini-style flip-up doors driving with doors open - Obscured driver-side mirror
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
I imagine that those are urban myths. The Transportation Code has no law that would fit hanging out of the window with anything about cargo, and there is no requirement to even HAVE a drivers side mirror on a passenger vehicle. The only requirement is that it have a mirror located to reflect to the operator a view of the highway for a distance of at least 200 feet from the rear of the vehicle.DFWCHLer wrote:LOL... that's a new one on me. I know a few people that will appreciate that tip.KBCraig wrote:TXI, Steve, you'll probably both enjoy this one:
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
Other interesting tickets I've seen:
Dude hanging out the window - improper cargo loading
Vehicle with modified Lamborghini-style flip-up doors driving with doors open - Obscured driver-side mirror
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
Okay - I finally found something. Not for CA specifically thoughtxinvestigator wrote:Thank you.Penn wrote:Well - I did a quick search and couldn't find the actual statute, but I did find a couple CA PD web sites that have FAQ sections. Disturbing the peace is one of the FAQ's. Here are the links:
http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/police/FAQ/ ... _peace.htm
http://ci.irvine.ca.us/ipd/info_center/police_faq6.asp
I'll try to find the actual statute later.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/g ... 988okcr231
Here's a quote from the article.
"However, the United States Supreme Court specifically stated that police do not have "unfettered discretion to arrest individuals for words or conduct that annoy or offend them." See City of Houston, ___ U.S. at ___, 107 S.Ct. at 2511. "
I think this applies to disturbing the peace type calls nationwide and is probably what law is being cited in the web pages I posted earlier. Case law as opposed to statutorial law.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
Your last post satisfied my curiousity for CA. Thanks.Penn wrote:Okay - I finally found something. Not for CA specifically thoughtxinvestigator wrote:Thank you.Penn wrote:Well - I did a quick search and couldn't find the actual statute, but I did find a couple CA PD web sites that have FAQ sections. Disturbing the peace is one of the FAQ's. Here are the links:
http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/police/FAQ/ ... _peace.htm
http://ci.irvine.ca.us/ipd/info_center/police_faq6.asp
I'll try to find the actual statute later.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/g ... 988okcr231
Here's a quote from the article.
"However, the United States Supreme Court specifically stated that police do not have "unfettered discretion to arrest individuals for words or conduct that annoy or offend them." See City of Houston, ___ U.S. at ___, 107 S.Ct. at 2511. "
I think this applies to disturbing the peace type calls nationwide and is probably what law is being cited in the web pages I posted earlier. Case law as opposed to statutorial law.
As far as Texas, our Disorderly Conduct laws don't allow for an offense if a person is annoyed or offended.
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5305
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Well, TXI, I have to split the opinion on this one with you. I agree about the mirror (only one required somewhere, not driver's side or anything like that) but I disagree with the cargo interpretation.txinvestigator wrote:I imagine that those are urban myths. The Transportation Code has no law that would fit hanging out of the window with anything about cargo, and there is no requirement to even HAVE a drivers side mirror on a passenger vehicle. The only requirement is that it have a mirror located to reflect to the operator a view of the highway for a distance of at least 200 feet from the rear of the vehicle.DFWCHLer wrote:LOL... that's a new one on me. I know a few people that will appreciate that tip.KBCraig wrote:TXI, Steve, you'll probably both enjoy this one:
http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007 ... yself.html
Other interesting tickets I've seen:
Dude hanging out the window - improper cargo loading
Vehicle with modified Lamborghini-style flip-up doors driving with doors open - Obscured driver-side mirror
I have actually written this one once (way back when it was the traffic code and specified 4 inches as the limit), but it is illegal to carry something extending beyond the sides of a vehicle without red flags. Check Transportation Code 547.382(b) which says:
At all other times, a vehicle transporting a load that extends beyond the vehicle's sides or more than four feet beyond the vehicle's rear shall display red flags that:
(1) are at least 12 inches square;
(2) mark the extremities of the load; and
(3) are placed where a lamp is required by this section.
Steve Rothstein