The war with Iran
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ghdad.html
Three rockets score a direct hit on US Iraq Embassy.
No report of casualties.
Three rockets score a direct hit on US Iraq Embassy.
No report of casualties.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 26852
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: The war with Iran
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://news.yahoo.com/eight-republican ... 53726.html
Eight Republicans join Democrats to pass in Senate a resolution limiting Trump’s war powers.
https://news.usni.org/2020/02/13/video- ... rabian-sea
USS Normandy seizes cache of Iranian made weapons in Arabian Sea.
Eight Republicans join Democrats to pass in Senate a resolution limiting Trump’s war powers.
https://news.usni.org/2020/02/13/video- ... rabian-sea
USS Normandy seizes cache of Iranian made weapons in Arabian Sea.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm
Re: The war with Iran
Great! The unconstitutional state of American Warfare for Profit needs to stop.
Constitutional process for a declaration of war is outlined in Article II Section 8 where Congress must declare war.
Declarations of War have historically always included (and LEGALLY must include) (1) The Parties between which the conflict exists, (2) that the President is authorized to act.
As an EXAMPLE: The War of 1812
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... ed_KingdomBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That war be and is hereby declared to exist between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and the dependencies thereof, and the United States of America and their territories; and that the President of the United States is hereby authorized to use the whole land and naval force of the United States to carry the same into effect, and to issue to private armed vessels of the United States commissions or letters of marque and general reprisal, in such form as he shall think proper, and under the seal of the United States, against the vessels, goods, and effects of the government of the said United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the subjects thereof.[1]
As a general rule, neither (1) nor (2) may be properly passed unless the parties are identified. It is logical that there must be some way to win against the stated enemy, and that the enemy must actually exist.
Now looking at the 2001 bill passed on September 18th:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoriza ... ce_of_2001Preamble
Joint Resolution
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.
Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Section 1 – Short Title
This joint resolution may be cited as the 'Authorization for Use of Military Force'.
Section 2 – Authorization For Use of United States Armed Forces
(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements-
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
We see (1) The Parties in which the conflict exists, (2) that the President is authorized to act. Except the parties aren't explicitly named... And after significant evidence that Pakistan as well as Saudi Arabia were heavily involved in protecting and enabling the attackers, we went after Iraq...
We have ourselves in an unwinnable situation because the first time we stepped aside from chasing down the attackers and those that enabled them, we abandoned any final pretense that this was a constitutional declaration of war and instead pursued the politically convenient rather than the militarily necessary.
Explain to me how this war authorization allows us to act in Africa? To quote a filthy rag: "Osama bin Laden is dead. Saddam Hussein is dead. 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is standing trial. Afghanistan is holding democratic elections later this month. We have pummeled Al Qaeda and kept attacks away from American soil." If so, then how are we using the same bill almost 19 years later to carry out activities in Africa and Eurasia? Not to mention the (arguably) dozens of black raids that occur in other places such as Central America or Europe. If there is any chance of identification, then we an just point back to this laughable excuse for a declaration of war and say "Congress Authorized"...
Its time for us to stop. It didn't work in Vietnam despite the great men that were sent there and it won't work in the middle east or anywhere else. If you invade another country and leave their people alive, you will always be the enemy. It just psychology. And the only way to stop is is to get the hell out.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-mur ... n-minister
Dem Senator meets with Iran foreign minister.
Sure why not. Be Jane Fonda.
Dem Senator meets with Iran foreign minister.
Sure why not. Be Jane Fonda.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://news.yahoo.com/iran-general-vis ... 47742.html
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Iranian General visits Baghdad, Iraq (a different general) Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-threatens- ... 46521.html
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
Trump threatens Iran again if Iraq interests attacked Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Iranian General visits Baghdad, Iraq (a different general) Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-threatens- ... 46521.html
Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
Trump threatens Iran again if Iraq interests attacked Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://news.yahoo.com/iran-warns-us-pa ... 46861.html
Iran warns deployment of patriot defensive missels to Iraq would be a bad thing.
Iran warns deployment of patriot defensive missels to Iraq would be a bad thing.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/large ... ard-635131
Iran has been rocked by lots of fires and explosions recently, this is just the latest. WaPo is blaming Israel and the US.
Iran has been rocked by lots of fires and explosions recently, this is just the latest. WaPo is blaming Israel and the US.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: The war with Iran
That's a great response by the Defense MinisterIsrael's defense minister said on July 5 his country was not "necessarily" behind every mysterious incident in Iran.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: The war with Iran
The "why can't we all just get along" doesn't work with Iran. Yes, war is sometimes necessary if we are to continue to exist as a country.Grayling813 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 2:56 pm Oh good, let’s get another war started spilling Americans’ blood and spending taxpayers’ money. Has not 20 years, thousands of lives lost, 10’s of thousands wounded and 2 trillion dollars spent taught the war hawks anything?
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
US denies report of Iran prisoner swap deal, release of $7B in frozen funds
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-denies ... -7-billion
7 billion dollars to the Iranians for 4 stupid people who just had to go to Iran for a visit.
Appears Iran is winning this war now.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-denies ... -7-billion
7 billion dollars to the Iranians for 4 stupid people who just had to go to Iran for a visit.
Appears Iran is winning this war now.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Re: The war with Iran
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-ea ... 021-05-04/
Note to self: if your ever a Swiss diplomat stationed in Iran, don’t live in a 20 story high rise apartment with a balcony.
Note to self: if your ever a Swiss diplomat stationed in Iran, don’t live in a 20 story high rise apartment with a balcony.