CT Legislator Wants To Increase Tax On Ammo By 50% But Can’t Do Basic Math
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/ct- ... asic-math/
No place but Connecticut
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
No place but Connecticut
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:57 am
- Location: San Antonio
Re: No place but Connecticut
Link to article arguing such a tax would be unconstitutional.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:21 pm
- Location: Red Oak
Re: No place but Connecticut
The article starts out by saying her math is wrong. It states that an increase of 50% on the tax is not a 50% tax on ammunition, but rather an increase from around 6% to around 9%. Well, she was right and the writer was wrong. The bill calls for a 50% tax on ammunition rather than an increase of 50% to the current tax.
He is right that there is no provision to exempt military and law enforcement. I can imagine if there was, military personnel and LE would be buying and selling ammunition at a deep discount.
He is right that there is no provision to exempt military and law enforcement. I can imagine if there was, military personnel and LE would be buying and selling ammunition at a deep discount.
Charlie
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:22 am
- Location: Houston
Re: No place but Connecticut
Do Politicians really think that criminals actually purchase ammo and guns from licensed FFLs and sporting good stores??
Annoy a Liberal, GET A JOB!