New Jersey takes it even lower

[Ruark]

New Jersey is notorious for suffocating gun laws, which include things like requiring permits to buy firearms. Now the Democrat-dominated Senate and a Democrat governor are expected to sign more restrictions into law. They include banning any ammunition that can penetrate body armor (there goes virtually all centerfire rifle ammo), background checks for private sales, 10 round magazine limits, and confirming a "justifiable need" for concealed carry.

And so the slow creep continues. Texas firearm owners should be vigilant; remember in the last election Clinton got 44% of the Texas vote. They're definitely camping outside the back door.

cite: http://fortune.com/2018/03/27/gun-contr ... ew-jersey/

[ELB]

Teen Mob Randomly Beats Man to Death on NJ Street: Prosecutors

"Not the first time" teens have beaten someone on the street.


Gun control works!

But for who?

[rotor]

I see a new industry develop in selling ammo on the east coast (underground). Bound to be highly profitable.

[The Annoyed Man]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

[Flightmare]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?

[anygunanywhere]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?

Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??

[strogg]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?

Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??

They always do. They just do so in their deluded version of reality where facts don't matter and they rule by emotion.

[deplorable]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?

Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??

When you shoot them.

[anygunanywhere]

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?

If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?

Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??

When you shoot them.

The only law tyrants should concern themselves with is in the Declaration of Independence.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organi.zing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

[Grundy1133]

this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.

[Soccerdad1995]

this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.

There are times when it is OK to let your ammo stock run low. Now is not one of those times.

[Grundy1133]

this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.

There are times when it is OK to let your ammo stock run low. Now is not one of those times.

my dad always had a huge stock pile. thats one thing he taught me. after he died my mom was going thru his things and found literally a combined total of upward of 20k rounds of 12 gauge, 7.62, 30-30,.22 LR, .22 short, 9mm, S&W .40, .357 magnum, .22 magnum, .38 special, and .410 rounds. everything from slugs to buk shot to bird shot to green tip to hollow point... he had enough ammo to supply a small armada. lol. according to some of the ammo, he had been stocking up since the 60s.

[strogg]

Nice. I'm not quite there yet. And of course, I'm stockpiling in the event ammo will become either scarce or prohibitively expensive. And extra magazines as spares because they are considered consumable items. That's my line to the anti-gunners, and I'm sticking with it.

[abom2]

When planning for contingencies one might want to keep the "drones" in mind. More than just eyes and ears today. Besides all of the data mining. I do not own any tin foil.

[philip964]

this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.

Although I ardently support the 2nd Amendment and defend it here and on Facebook, and even though I have a LTC, I don’t have any guns or ammunition. It’s just way to scary a thing to have.

I did accidentally buy 2 ten round magazines for an fn ps90, they are for sale if some one wants them.

Then I will have nothing.