http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01 ... ation.html
![anamatedbannana :anamatedbanana](./images/smilies/anim_bannana.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
TxRVer wrote:Doesn't California pipe a lot of water from out of state?
I believe LA does, but not sure about the entire state.TxRVer wrote:Doesn't California pipe a lot of water from out of state?
Agreed. Which is why I so desperately want them to try it. They would fail in every way and quick too. Kinda reminds me of a kid wanting to run away from home. The second the sun goes down and they get cold, they will come back.Jusme wrote:TxRVer wrote:Doesn't California pipe a lot of water from out of state?
Yep,
Now they will have to buy it from the US. I'll bet it won't be as cheap as it is now. This is just more snowflake posturing, they don't like the outcome of the election, and are hoping more people will listen to their whining. While I would be all for them leaving, they cannot sustain themselves without Federal help, and would have to tax their "citizens' so much, that the population will drop overnight as everyone crosses the border.
HHHMM. Gotta say I never looked at it like that. Interesting. I'm sure there are plenty of enemies that would finance them for such a feat. Good point. Maybe split it in 2 states is looking better and better but I guess they wouldn't be interested in doing that though. I reckon we will all just have to continue to hear the belly-aching cuz it's obvious they aren't going to stop.jmra wrote:The only problem I have with it is they would probably quickly align themselves with our enemies bringing threats even closer on another land border.