80% Glock - deep concealment
Moderator: carlson1
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
I can get away with g43 in a pocket holster. Even my g19 is doable IWB with shirt tucked in, clips show but nobody notices.
Interesting idea, but not my cup of tea.
Interesting idea, but not my cup of tea.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:20 pm
- Location: Katy-ish
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
I think you're right. But as a G17 owner, I can't imagine that slide (even with the tiny grip frame) in a front pocket. At least not if I was expecting to ever have to sit.barres wrote:I believe someone is thinking pocket carry for this setup, hence the comparison in size to a cell phone that many throw into a pocket these days.
I was hoping someone would come up with a cool "I could use it here..." scenario. I haven't heard one yet. They may find customers but I am doubtful that they'd find enough to justify production runs of any size.
NRA Endowment - NRA RSO - Μολὼν λάβε
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Just buy a G17 and cut the grip down to accept G26 mags.goose wrote:This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
CHL Holder since 10/08
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:20 pm
- Location: Katy-ish
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Having worked on a sub-2k to take the G19 magazines, the thought has crossed my mind. And I really do like the idea. BUT emotionally it feels 100 times more difficult to carve on a Glock frame than a Kel-Tec. And I'm not dissing the Kel-Tec but one was (when we bought ours) a $240 frame and one is a $500 frame. A few more years to soak up with the teenaged boys. After they leave the nest and my dollars free up a skosh, this might be pretty high on my list.locke_n_load wrote:Just buy a G17 and cut the grip down to accept G26 mags.goose wrote:This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
NRA Endowment - NRA RSO - Μολὼν λάβε
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
You can get a 3rd party frame... can't remember where though.goose wrote:Having worked on a sub-2k to take the G19 magazines, the thought has crossed my mind. And I really do like the idea. BUT emotionally it feels 100 times more difficult to carve on a Glock frame than a Kel-Tec. And I'm not dissing the Kel-Tec but one was (when we bought ours) a $240 frame and one is a $500 frame. A few more years to soak up with the teenaged boys. After they leave the nest and my dollars free up a skosh, this might be pretty high on my list.locke_n_load wrote:Just buy a G17 and cut the grip down to accept G26 mags.goose wrote:This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Converse, TX
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Pretty sure those guys are going to get a visit from the ATF. The kind that requires lawyers. LOTS of them.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
They say they will be at the SHOT show. I suppose we'll know more if they're still around after that.
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Exactly!Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
That's exactly what I do, it even works pretty well for a smaller person like me.John Galt wrote:Exactly!Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Who sells an 80% G26 frame?Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country