JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
cmgee67
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:45 pm

JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#1

Post by cmgee67 »

Just seeing yalls thoughts of JHP or FMJ rounds for defensive carry. I currently carry hornady critical defense 115gr JHPs in my Glock 19 but have often though an FMJ would work just as well. I know the JHP causes more damage and the FMJ will penetrate a lot more sometimes over penetrate but do any of you carry FMJ instead of JHP and why?
User avatar

AF-Odin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Near Fort Cavazos (formerly Hood)

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#2

Post by AF-Odin »

Simple answer, what do PDs carry? Some form of JHP. As stated, over penetration!!
AF-Odin
Texas LTC, SSC & FRC Instructor
NRA Pistol, Home Firearms Safety, Personal Protection in the Home Instructor & RSO
NRA & TSRA Life Member

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#3

Post by parabelum »

The only exception for fmj in my EDC would be 230 gr .45 fmj. Everything else, jhp.
In a 9mm especially, go heavy and/or fast (147 or 125+P).
User avatar

Javier730
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:29 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#4

Post by Javier730 »

My fmjs are for target practice and for when poop hits the fan (luckily for me it hasnt) since I have more if it. Hollow points for carry 100% of the time.
“Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity.”
― Horace Mann
User avatar

Jusme
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5350
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Johnson County, Texas

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#5

Post by Jusme »

+1 on the Hornady Critical Defense. I only use FMJ for practice, FMJ has no consistent expansion, so I would never want it for self defense, plus as everyone else has said over penetration. I want all of the energy expended inside my target.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second :rules: :patriot:

crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2453
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#6

Post by crazy2medic »

What everybody else said FMJ too much penetrate, my choice 230gr hydrashoks
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention
Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here- John Parker
User avatar

Jketchum
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#7

Post by Jketchum »

parabelum wrote:The only exception for fmj in my EDC would be 230 gr .45 fmj. Everything else, jhp.
In a 9mm especially, go heavy and/or fast (147 or 125+P).
I agree, however I do keep jhp in my XDs .45 my 9mm & .357sig always have jhp when carried.
User avatar

Glockedandlocked
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:00 pm

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#8

Post by Glockedandlocked »

FMJ over penetrates, it's good for range ammo and maybe a a problem arises type stash, but for serious carry jhp should be necessary.

Do your research, find the weight, and maker that you like and carry on.

Personally I carry the same ammo we use at work, Rem Golden Sabers, 124 gr JHP. They are effective and not too terribly expensive.


It is all about expansion and shock, making bigger wound channels and causing bleed out if a central nervous system hit is not achieved.
User avatar

longhorn86
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:49 pm
Location: Schertz, TX

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#9

Post by longhorn86 »

230 gr .45 ACP Gold Dots for carry, FMJ are strictly for the range
NRA Life Member

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#10

Post by K.Mooneyham »

The NYPD, once upon a time, mandated that their officers carry FMJ instead of JHP, which was getting a bad rap in the press. The number of shoot-throughs of suspects and ricochets from misses (which sometimes struck bystanders) rose considerably. After some time, they went back to JHP, and at the present time, they carry Speer Gold Dot 9mm +P 124g.

ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#11

Post by ghostrider »

I think there are a few options:

1. JHP
2. JHP

or....
3. JHP


:-)
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Bastrop, Texas
Contact:

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#12

Post by oljames3 »

JHP. :txflag:
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
Safety Ministry Director, First Baptist Church Elgin
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#13

Post by joe817 »

Well, there are some exceptions to the tried and tested(and proved valid) rule to ALWAYS use JHP's in SD rounds.

EXCEPT when a 'small gun' round is used. EG: .380. acp, .32 acp and Heaven forbid, even smaller. ;-)

and :iagree: Don't even think of using FMJ rounds in larger calibers.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: JHP or FMJ for defensive carry?

#14

Post by Pawpaw »

Another thing to consider is that FMJ is much more likely to deflect when it hits bone, turning a well placed shot into one that hits nothing vital.

JHP on the other hand has a better chance of digging into the bone and smashing it's way through with little deflection.

I remember reading an article about up close fighting and how a shot to the pelvic girdle could put an attacker on the ground then and there. 230gr JHP was pretty consistent in that regard, but 230gr FMJ had a tendency to just ride along the bone without doing much damage.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”