Home Defense Preparation
Moderator: carlson1
-
Topic author - Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:06 pm
- Location: Brownsville
Home Defense Preparation
I've been advised by a few long time shooters not to use any weapon for home protection that would appear as if I was "planning to kill someone."
For example, one person told me not to load my shotgun with "OO" buckshot, but use birdshot instead. Another suggested a .38 instead of a .357 or larger caliber.
Their reasoning is that a grand jury would be less likely to indict someone who used a perceived less lethal weapon in a fatal shooting, than one with a high probability of lethal effect.
Is there any validity to this advise?
Chuck
Brownsville, TX
For example, one person told me not to load my shotgun with "OO" buckshot, but use birdshot instead. Another suggested a .38 instead of a .357 or larger caliber.
Their reasoning is that a grand jury would be less likely to indict someone who used a perceived less lethal weapon in a fatal shooting, than one with a high probability of lethal effect.
Is there any validity to this advise?
Chuck
Brownsville, TX
A couple of things:
1) The circumstances of a shooting (who, what, when, where, why?) are several orders of magnitude more relevant than whether an actor loaded his .357-capable wheelgun with .38 rounds because he thought it was more humane/compassionate/whatever to use those versus the full-power cartridges.
2) If someone feels threatened enough to break out the 12ga or a magnum revolver (ie, to use deadly force), he or she is best served loading the weapon with the most powerful cartridge he or she can control in said weapon, to stop a threat using the minimum number of cartridges.
In brief, I would consider what you heard to be very bad advice.
1) The circumstances of a shooting (who, what, when, where, why?) are several orders of magnitude more relevant than whether an actor loaded his .357-capable wheelgun with .38 rounds because he thought it was more humane/compassionate/whatever to use those versus the full-power cartridges.
2) If someone feels threatened enough to break out the 12ga or a magnum revolver (ie, to use deadly force), he or she is best served loading the weapon with the most powerful cartridge he or she can control in said weapon, to stop a threat using the minimum number of cartridges.
In brief, I would consider what you heard to be very bad advice.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
At what range?HighVelocity wrote:I agree. Bird shot is a very poor choice against 2 legged varmints.orc4hire wrote:You have been given poor advice.
I have a very open floorplan house, but the longest shot I could take would be about 36 feet, and that's if I'm standing with my back to the wall at one end of the hallway, and the BG is standing against the far wall of my living room. That's wall-to-wall distance, not muzzle to target.
A far more typical distance in a BG scenario would be 1-5 yards, because typical room sizes in an average American home are no more than 16' along the longest wall. We've got a 14x16' master bedroom, and a 20x21' living room, which are considered pretty large for a 1700 s.f. 3/2 ranch.
Even from my 18.5 inch cylinder choke Winnie 1300, a load of No. 8 is going to hit like a slug at 10-15 feet. That's why the first two rounds out of the tube will be birdshot, and the rest of the mag is No.4 buck. And there are four slugs in a buttsock; I'm prepared for all ranges from "across the bedroom" to "across the back yard".
Not that a shotgun is going to be my first choice. I'd rather not have both hands full of weapon. The first thing I'll reach for will be my P97 in my right hand, and either/or flashlight or cell phone in my left, depending on the circumstances.
Kevin
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
As usual...I am onboard with Orc & H.V. on this one...
As the situation dictates...My home defense handgun is there to give me a chance, and an opportunity, to get to said shotgun with 00 buck loaded up...
There is no reason to sweat the "legal" jeapardies in regards to what you use to defend yourself in your own home...
It used to be people did that with a baseball bat...Until the BeeGees came in with knives...Then people started using handguns, when the BeeGees came in with their own cheap guns...And so on and so on...
I only see this as a problem for the bad guys...
As the situation dictates...My home defense handgun is there to give me a chance, and an opportunity, to get to said shotgun with 00 buck loaded up...
There is no reason to sweat the "legal" jeapardies in regards to what you use to defend yourself in your own home...
It used to be people did that with a baseball bat...Until the BeeGees came in with knives...Then people started using handguns, when the BeeGees came in with their own cheap guns...And so on and so on...
I only see this as a problem for the bad guys...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
Yes, that's why I specified 10-15'.orc4hire wrote:KBCraig wrote:Even from my 18.5 inch cylinder choke Winnie 1300, a load of No. 8 is going to hit like a slug at 10-15 feet. That's why the first two rounds out of the tube will be birdshot, and the rest of the mag is No.4 buck. And there are four slugs in a buttsock; I'm prepared for all ranges from "across the bedroom" to "across the back yard".
Have you actually tried that? Reason I ask is that I have. I've fired birdshot from a Winchester 1300 (20 gauge, 18") at a piece of cardboard about 20' away. The shot patterned fairly evenly in a circle a foot or more in diameter.
Think about it: how many 20' shots can you make in your house, muzzle to target? If your house is that big or that open, then yeah, load up with buckshot.
Not that I object to loading up with buckshot to start with; I just prefer the No.8 to limit overpenetration.
Kevin
-
Topic author - Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:06 pm
- Location: Brownsville
Re: Home Defense Preparation
i took a report where the guy held two car burglars with a .454 Casull. it was one of the few guns the guy used for hunting. use what you got. i have AR15s, AK47s, FALs, lever and bolt guns, shotguns, and plenty of pistols. i wouldn't hesitate to use any of them for home defense. if i aim for your chest with a .223, i don't think it's going to matter whether it's a 5 shot bolt gun or a 30 round AR15. the only problem i see is if you empty the 30 round magazine.RioShooter wrote:I've been advised by a few long time shooters not to use any weapon for home protection that would appear as if I was "planning to kill someone."
For example, one person told me not to load my shotgun with "OO" buckshot, but use birdshot instead. Another suggested a .38 instead of a .357 or larger caliber.
Their reasoning is that a grand jury would be less likely to indict someone who used a perceived less lethal weapon in a fatal shooting, than one with a high probability of lethal effect.
Is there any validity to this advise?
Chuck
Brownsville, TX
on the other hand, i keep a .38 smith revolver made in 1923 in my wife's jewelry cabinet. all else stays locked up in cabinets throughout the house. :)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
I hear this all of the time while teaching. There are urban myths that you should use perceived less lethal ammo, that you should never score a perfect score when testing, that you should not carry less lethal means of defense on your person while carry a firearm, etc.
Its all bunk. Regarding ammo choices, what I would worry about is overpenetration and striking an innocent, not "over-killing" the badguy.
Recording testing scores, all that is reported to the state, and the only records we keep, is whether you pass or fail anyway. I train to win, period.
I always carry a less-lethal means of defense, usually OC. There could easily be a time where using OC early in an encounter could keep it from esclating to a point where DF is necessary. No DF, no Grand Jury. ;)
Its all bunk. Regarding ammo choices, what I would worry about is overpenetration and striking an innocent, not "over-killing" the badguy.
Recording testing scores, all that is reported to the state, and the only records we keep, is whether you pass or fail anyway. I train to win, period.
I always carry a less-lethal means of defense, usually OC. There could easily be a time where using OC early in an encounter could keep it from esclating to a point where DF is necessary. No DF, no Grand Jury. ;)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
After having seen this I rethought my "standard 'home-d'" loading for my shotgun.
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot14.htm
I used to keep one round of #6 chambered, followed by one in the mag, then two rounds of 00 Buck, then three slugs (Breneke), then one last 00.
I have changed to four rounds of 00 followed by four slugs.
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot14.htm
I used to keep one round of #6 chambered, followed by one in the mag, then two rounds of 00 Buck, then three slugs (Breneke), then one last 00.
I have changed to four rounds of 00 followed by four slugs.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
the shotgun i use at work that comes home with me stays loaded with every other round being slug/00 buck. i keep it with the chamber empty, safety off, and the trigger pulled.jimlongley wrote:After having seen this I rethought my "standard 'home-d'" loading for my shotgun.
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot14.htm
I used to keep one round of #6 chambered, followed by one in the mag, then two rounds of 00 Buck, then three slugs (Breneke), then one last 00.
I have changed to four rounds of 00 followed by four slugs.