I am not a Law Enforcement basher...

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

#16

Post by stevie_d_64 »

Bingo!

Charles wins the cookie...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar

Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6658
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

#17

Post by Paladin »

Chris wrote:
granted scott's tactics weren't the wisest of moves, but nothing he did was criminally wrong. if you want details, PM me.
I read that report you posted about it a while back and I agree with you 100%. It was a VERY CLEAR self defense shooting.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

Chris
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: DFW

#18

Post by Chris »

KBCraig wrote:Back to the original topic...

I am a LEO, without a CHL (I should get one, but between procrastination and budget, it just hasn't come to the forefront.)
dude, it's $25 and a letter from the chief. i know you can squeeze that out.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I have to admit I haven’t been following this issue very closely. However, as I understand, the bogus concern is that off duty LEO’s are at risk of being shot by mistake if/when they intervene to stop a crime. Even accepting this premise, which I do not, then there is no reason to prohibit off duty carrying. Just do away with the “always on duty� doctrine. Then LEO’s can carry off duty for self-defense, but not by obliged to intervene to stop a crime, thus removing the risk of being shot by mistake by an on-duty LEO.

Make no mistake about it; if LEO’s are disarmed while off-duty, then CHL statutes will be targeted shortly thereafter! I can hear the argument now, “If COPS can’t carry off-duty because it’s too dangerous, then mere citizens certainly shouldn’t carry guns.�

Chas.
the agencies i've worked for had no policy requiring you to be armed at all times, although i know of some that do. you are considered on-duty 24/7, but the 'neglect of duty' only applies in your jurisdiction of commissioning. as a rule, i never live where i work anyway.

most departments around DFW have unwritten policies that you are to be a good witness, not a hero. unless we're talking life and death, there's no reason to be a cowboy.

at the agency i worked at before, an ON DUTY detective was shot by another officer. so does that also mean we should eliminate plain clothes officers?

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

#19

Post by KBCraig »

Chris wrote:
KBCraig wrote:Back to the original topic...

I am a LEO, without a CHL (I should get one, but between procrastination and budget, it just hasn't come to the forefront.)
dude, it's $25 and a letter from the chief. i know you can squeeze that out.
I'm a LEO, but I'm not a TCLEOSE-certified Texas "peace officer". There is a difference, yanno... and there are thousands of us in Texas.

Kevin

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

#20

Post by GrillKing »

KBCraig wrote:

I'm a LEO, but I'm not a TCLEOSE-certified Texas "peace officer". There is a difference, yanno... and there are thousands of us in Texas.

Kevin
What is an example of a non-TCLEOSE LEO? I can only think of Federal or is it something else?

Thanks,

Gary

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

#21

Post by KBCraig »

Any federal LEO (FBI, DEA, ICE, BOP, Parks Service, Postal Inspectors, Treasury/Secret Service, etc., etc.)... all are LEOs, but not "peace officers" under Texas law, and thus don't get the "peace officer" rate on the CHL.

Bureau of Prisons personnel number at least 3,000 in Texas, but even though we're "qualified law enforcement officers", we're not police (nor do we pretend to be).

Kevin

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

#22

Post by GrillKing »

Thanks,

Gary
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”