Arrested for wearing fatigues

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

LSUTiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#16

Post by LSUTiger »

image.jpeg
Look it's an AR pistol, an SBR and a Rifle
Chance favors the prepared. Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
User avatar

Jago668
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#17

Post by Jago668 »

You need a law requiring all camera equipment to be painted neon colors now.
NRA Benefactor Member
User avatar

oohrah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1385
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: McLennan County

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#18

Post by oohrah »

Thread title is misleading. According to the article I read, the man was questioned and released and left in his own vehicle. Probably an experience some of us will have after OC starts. Hysterical MWAG calls.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#19

Post by MechAg94 »

This is Texas, there people wearing fatigues of one kind or another everywhere. I guess these are people who never leave Austin.
User avatar

TVGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
Location: DFW

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#20

Post by TVGuy »

oohrah wrote:Thread title is misleading. According to the article I read, the man was questioned and released and left in his own vehicle. Probably an experience some of us will have after OC starts. Hysterical MWAG calls.
Agreed.
User avatar

SA_Steve
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 357
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: San Antonio, north central hills

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#21

Post by SA_Steve »

Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
You may have the last word.
User avatar

TVGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
Location: DFW

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#22

Post by TVGuy »

SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.

twomillenium
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1691
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:42 pm
Location: houston area

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#23

Post by twomillenium »

TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Texas LTC Instructor, NRA pistol instructor, RSO, NRA Endowment Life , TSRA, Glock enthusiast (tho I have others)
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to add it to a fruit salad.

You will never know another me, this could be good or not so good, but it is still true.
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#24

Post by JALLEN »

TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.

An updated article says "after multiple sweeps were completed."
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#25

Post by Glockster »

twomillenium wrote:
TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
User avatar

VoiceofReason
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1748
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#26

Post by VoiceofReason »

Glockster wrote:
twomillenium wrote:
TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
If they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#27

Post by Glockster »

VoiceofReason wrote:
Glockster wrote:
twomillenium wrote:
TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
If they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.
Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs? :thumbs2:
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8403
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#28

Post by Abraham »

I'd sure like to see those males who wear their clothing so revealing I can see their posterior regions loud and clear be put under arrest for being disgusting in public.

Honestly, I guess it's a ghetto/prison/thug thing, sadly I don't see these mutts being bothered for indecent exposure.
User avatar

VoiceofReason
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1748
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#29

Post by VoiceofReason »

Glockster wrote:
VoiceofReason wrote:
Glockster wrote:
twomillenium wrote:
TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
If they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.
Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs? :thumbs2:
I want to clarify. I am not advocating a “demonstration” or anything like “OCT”. All I am saying is those that have a license in or near a community that takes that attitude open carry for a week or two. I think the 90 minute detentions will quickly drop to 15 seconds or less.

About the second time the same officer handled a call on me, I would offer to buy a cup of coffee and pie. Might end up with a good friend in law enforcement.
:lol:
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues

#30

Post by Glockster »

VoiceofReason wrote:
Glockster wrote:
VoiceofReason wrote:
Glockster wrote:
twomillenium wrote:
TVGuy wrote:
SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
If they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.
Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs? :thumbs2:
I want to clarify. I am not advocating a “demonstration” or anything like “OCT”. All I am saying is those that have a license in or near a community that takes that attitude open carry for a week or two. I think the 90 minute detentions will quickly drop to 15 seconds or less.

About the second time the same officer handled a call on me, I would offer to buy a cup of coffee and pie. Might end up with a good friend in law enforcement.
:lol:
LOL...that could become our thing. Anyone from TexasCHLforum who gets stopped offers to buy the officer a cup of coffee and a slice of pie. OTH....that could possibly increase the stops (based on the high desirability of pie! :tiphat:
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”