Arrested for wearing fatigues
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Look it's an AR pistol, an SBR and a Rifle
Chance favors the prepared. Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
You need a law requiring all camera equipment to be painted neon colors now.
NRA Benefactor Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
- Location: McLennan County
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Thread title is misleading. According to the article I read, the man was questioned and released and left in his own vehicle. Probably an experience some of us will have after OC starts. Hysterical MWAG calls.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
This is Texas, there people wearing fatigues of one kind or another everywhere. I guess these are people who never leave Austin.
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Agreed.oohrah wrote:Thread title is misleading. According to the article I read, the man was questioned and released and left in his own vehicle. Probably an experience some of us will have after OC starts. Hysterical MWAG calls.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:59 pm
- Location: San Antonio, north central hills
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
You may have the last word.
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:42 pm
- Location: houston area
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
Texas LTC Instructor, NRA pistol instructor, RSO, NRA Endowment Life , TSRA, Glock enthusiast (tho I have others)
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to add it to a fruit salad.
You will never know another me, this could be good or not so good, but it is still true.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to add it to a fruit salad.
You will never know another me, this could be good or not so good, but it is still true.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
- Location: Comal County
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
An updated article says "after multiple sweeps were completed."
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.twomillenium wrote:Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
- Location: South Texas
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Glockster wrote:Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.twomillenium wrote:Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lost
If they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs?VoiceofReason wrote:Glockster wrote:Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.twomillenium wrote:Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lostIf they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c56a/2c56a767423ea9c1bf7e136bfdf318ac01c684c6" alt="thumbs2 :thumbs2:"
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
I'd sure like to see those males who wear their clothing so revealing I can see their posterior regions loud and clear be put under arrest for being disgusting in public.
Honestly, I guess it's a ghetto/prison/thug thing, sadly I don't see these mutts being bothered for indecent exposure.
Honestly, I guess it's a ghetto/prison/thug thing, sadly I don't see these mutts being bothered for indecent exposure.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
- Location: South Texas
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
I want to clarify. I am not advocating a “demonstration” or anything like “OCT”. All I am saying is those that have a license in or near a community that takes that attitude open carry for a week or two. I think the 90 minute detentions will quickly drop to 15 seconds or less.Glockster wrote:Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs?VoiceofReason wrote:Glockster wrote:Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.twomillenium wrote:Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lostIf they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
About the second time the same officer handled a call on me, I would offer to buy a cup of coffee and pie. Might end up with a good friend in law enforcement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18016/18016154d921a13e352fadb74db658c201a87d4e" alt="Laughing :lol:"
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Arrested for wearing fatigues
LOL...that could become our thing. Anyone from TexasCHLforum who gets stopped offers to buy the officer a cup of coffee and a slice of pie. OTH....that could possibly increase the stops (based on the high desirability of pie!VoiceofReason wrote:I want to clarify. I am not advocating a “demonstration” or anything like “OCT”. All I am saying is those that have a license in or near a community that takes that attitude open carry for a week or two. I think the 90 minute detentions will quickly drop to 15 seconds or less.Glockster wrote:Said in a way that I hope doesn't come across like....some groups that carry for emphasis....I have pondered what exactly someone like Austin would do if there were hundreds and hundreds of MWAG calls coming in. Would they give it up and go back to their day jobs?VoiceofReason wrote:Glockster wrote:Do we have any information as to whether he did what he did to alarm anyone? If he was just minding his own business and such, I have to say that a 90 minute detention based on his clothing looked suspicious...a lot of folks would probably have an attitude. Sounds like profiling based on the clothes he had on. Sort of like someone wearing a hoodie...on a cold night. This sounds an awful lot like what the future will bring with SMWAG (scary MWAG) calls. If they spent 90 minutes on him because of clothing and camera equipment, and they thought that was a reasonable detention, can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.twomillenium wrote:Do you think he may have copped an attitude so the LEO thought "lets take our time and thoroughly check this out".TVGuy wrote:I agree that a 90 minute detention because you're wearing camo is a bit excessive. I do wonder what they spent the remaining 89 minutes doing after they realized he was carrying camera equipment.SA_Steve wrote:Yes, released
no harm except for his and the cops 90 minutes lostIf they start that game we can stop it real quick. All we have to do is just start carrying so they won't have time to do anything else but go from one MWAG to another.can't wait to see what will be justified because of someone openly carrying.
About the second time the same officer handled a call on me, I would offer to buy a cup of coffee and pie. Might end up with a good friend in law enforcement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5508/b5508f8a183c0449de230eca4e2b8782220adba0" alt="tiphat :tiphat:"
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?