The Mass Shootings Tracker study

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

The Mass Shootings Tracker study

#1

Post by baldeagle »

I just completed a study of all 353 "mass shootings" tracked by the Mass Shooting Tracker website. Here's the article: https://www.txantimedia.com/?p=2097

Some facts. Only 2% of the shootings are what I would define as ones that most people worry about. For example, the shooting in Charleston at the church was completely unpredictable by the victims. They went to church expecting to pray and ended up being shot. Most people do not worry about gang shootings or drug-related shootings, because most people aren't involved in those types of activities. The vast majority of these shootings involve gangs, drug dealers and other criminal-related activities like bar fights or arguments at parties.

There are two categories of people who do need to worry about these types of shootings; those unfortunate enough to live in the areas where criminal activity is rampant and people who live with people who are violent. Domestic violence constituted 16% of the total shootings. And they are particularly deadly. Very few people escape alive from a home where someone decides to shoot everyone including themselves.

Of the 2% three were hate crimes, two were cases of mentally unstable actors and two were islamic terrorism. I'm sure all of us are familiar with at least some of them. The Charleston church shooting, the Chattanooga Marine recruiting station shooting, the on-camera shooting of the TV broadcasters, the so-called Planned Parenthood shooting and the recent terrorist attack in San Bernardino. The two others as lesser known. A shooting at a movie theatre in Monroe, LA, and a shooting in Colorado Springs where a guy randomly shot people as was killed by the police.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member

jb2012
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: The Mass Shootings Tracker study

#2

Post by jb2012 »

I did a similar much less in depth study on the website after an article was released in our school news paper that linked to that website. It takes a whopping 15 minutes to debunk it if that. The fact that the left wing even thinks about using it as a credible source is comical. Nice work though!
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: The Mass Shootings Tracker study

#3

Post by mojo84 »

I get a security warning when I click on the link.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: The Mass Shootings Tracker study

#4

Post by baldeagle »

mojo84 wrote:I get a security warning when I click on the link.
Yeah, I haven't bothered updating the certificate in years. It's perfectly safe to visit.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: The Mass Shootings Tracker study

#5

Post by mojo84 »

baldeagle wrote:
mojo84 wrote:I get a security warning when I click on the link.
Yeah, I haven't bothered updating the certificate in years. It's perfectly safe to visit.
Thanks
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”