Page 1 of 2
Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:41 am
by bmwrdr
Are there any forum members with a valid LTC/ CHL who would mutually agree with my thought about the legal possession of a silencer without the currently required and difficult regulations? If so please post your thoughts. Thank you in advance.
Edited title, changed the term "silencer" to "suppressor."
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:49 am
by TexasJohnBoy
It should be regulated in the same way as a long gun - NICS background check and you buy it. No tax stamp, no etched name/trust on it, etc.
Please see
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=87563 and contact your representatives and senators!
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:59 am
by The Wall
I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:06 am
by The Wall
superchief wrote:Why limit it to LTC holders? Tell your representatives to support the "Hearing Protection Act" and let freedom ring!
Be careful of what you wish for. When they find out how well they work it may become mandatory for all guns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18016/18016154d921a13e352fadb74db658c201a87d4e" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Where I live, every year residence complain about the noise from the duck hunters. It has been brought up to require suppressors on their guns. Amazing how the sound carries over the water. Doesn't bother me.
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:21 am
by The Annoyed Man
The Wall wrote:I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.
This^^^
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:37 am
by TreyHouston
The Annoyed Man wrote:The Wall wrote:I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.
This^^^
I heard many countries in Europe require them if you go hunting. Could become another charge!
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:47 am
by jason812
TexasJohnBoy wrote:It should be regulated in the same way as a long gun - NICS background check and you buy it. No tax stamp, no etched name/trust on it, etc.
Please see
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=87563 and contact your representatives and senators!
That's the first step but why should they be treated like a firearm? If you can legally possess a firearm, the amount of noise it makes shouldn't matter. You can legally make your own firearm without letting the government know. Treat a suppressor the same way and I will make my own and save some dollar bills doing so.
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:30 pm
by puma guy
superchief wrote:Why limit it to LTC holders? Tell your representatives to support the "Hearing Protection Act" and let freedom ring!
Hear! Hear! I agree with that as does the ringing in my ears!
Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:59 pm
by The Annoyed Man
TreyHouston wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:The Wall wrote:I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.
This^^^
I heard many countries in Europe require them if you go hunting. Could become another charge!
And in many European countries, the hard part is getting gun. You can buy the suppressor at a hardware store, and it costs about $35.
https://www.amazon.com/Lawn-Mower-Muffl ... =155375011
Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:12 pm
by rotor
If you can legally own a gun why can't you just go out and buy a silencer? If you can legally own a semi-auto carbine why can't you own a fully auto carbine? These are both "legal" items with a complicated and expensive taxation to own. I am not talking about grenades or items that are technically illegal but items that if you jump through the loops and pay the dollars you can own now.
Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:17 pm
by tbrown
It should be as regulated as a bugle mute.
Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:19 pm
by ScottDLS
rotor wrote:If you can legally own a gun why can't you just go out and buy a silencer? If you can legally own a semi-auto carbine why can't you own a fully auto carbine? These are both "legal" items with a complicated and expensive taxation to own. I am not talking about grenades or items that are technically illegal but items that if you jump through the loops and pay the dollars you can own now.
If you're willing to jump through the hoops, spend the money, and find someone who will sell it to you you can buy a mortar and ammunition or a grenade launcher and grenades. What you can't do is buy a full auto that was made after 1986... So yes to cannons but no to automatic Glock 18's.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62fa/f62fa4152a225c3faecfce6e3dd764f3f6e48eda" alt="rules :rules:"
Delete
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:36 pm
by ScottDLS
Wrong topic area.
Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 3:24 pm
by rotor
ScottDLS wrote:rotor wrote:If you can legally own a gun why can't you just go out and buy a silencer? If you can legally own a semi-auto carbine why can't you own a fully auto carbine? These are both "legal" items with a complicated and expensive taxation to own. I am not talking about grenades or items that are technically illegal but items that if you jump through the loops and pay the dollars you can own now.
If you're willing to jump through the hoops, spend the money, and find someone who will sell it to you you can buy a mortar and ammunition or a grenade launcher and grenades. What you can't do is buy a full auto that was made after 1986... So yes to cannons but no to automatic Glock 18's.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62fa/f62fa4152a225c3faecfce6e3dd764f3f6e48eda" alt="rules :rules:"
Which is why a .45 Tommy Gun sells for $30K and a semi-auto (new) one is what $1,200 or so. I really don't want a mortar or cannon but I might want a Thompson sub if it were affordable just to play with and don't see why I should not be able to buy one without going through all the hassle. Silencers, machine guns, toys for people. Silencer may have some value as more than a toy if they help with hearing loss prevention but for most people I think they are in the toy category, which is OK.