Fascinating election logic
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:09 pm
This election gets more interesting every day.
Trump’s alleged debate jaw-dropper is just plain fascinatin', as Ross Perot would have said.
It’s right out of the pages of Atlas Shrugged. Trump is expected to endorse the conduct of the election in advance, without prior knowledge of wrongdoing in the process. His permission to be a victim is expected.
Meanwhile, Hillary is thumping her unwholesome chest about how the Russians are attempting to influence the election in Trump’s favor through hacking and social engineering to foment doubt.
Trump is unAmerican because he won’t grant the election process a blank check, which makes me wonder. If Hillary felt the election had been stolen from her, would she willfully fail to do her patriotic duty to stand in defense of election integrity?
Trump and Clinton are the two most interested parties that have standing in court to do anything. By law, mere voters who wish to challenge an election have no voice in court. You or I can’t sue to enforce election law. We don’t have what the courts call “standing.” Candidates and election officials can seek fair elections through courts, the rest of the world can’t.
Trump is an egotistic braggart who lacks the spine to stand behind his own bluster.
But at least he’s not a lying, traitorous globalist who seeks to profit by the destruction of America, effecting her deleterious policies with the ultimately violent force of government while denying citizens access to self-defense.
At least he’s not that, and that’s enough to gain my vote.
Put up with Trump’s hot air, make America great again, look for better choices next go-round.
Trump’s alleged debate jaw-dropper is just plain fascinatin', as Ross Perot would have said.
It’s right out of the pages of Atlas Shrugged. Trump is expected to endorse the conduct of the election in advance, without prior knowledge of wrongdoing in the process. His permission to be a victim is expected.
Meanwhile, Hillary is thumping her unwholesome chest about how the Russians are attempting to influence the election in Trump’s favor through hacking and social engineering to foment doubt.
Trump is unAmerican because he won’t grant the election process a blank check, which makes me wonder. If Hillary felt the election had been stolen from her, would she willfully fail to do her patriotic duty to stand in defense of election integrity?
Trump and Clinton are the two most interested parties that have standing in court to do anything. By law, mere voters who wish to challenge an election have no voice in court. You or I can’t sue to enforce election law. We don’t have what the courts call “standing.” Candidates and election officials can seek fair elections through courts, the rest of the world can’t.
Trump is an egotistic braggart who lacks the spine to stand behind his own bluster.
But at least he’s not a lying, traitorous globalist who seeks to profit by the destruction of America, effecting her deleterious policies with the ultimately violent force of government while denying citizens access to self-defense.
At least he’s not that, and that’s enough to gain my vote.
Put up with Trump’s hot air, make America great again, look for better choices next go-round.
