Page 1 of 1
Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:02 pm
by baldeagle
BREAKING: The NRA Just SENT OBAMA THIS BRUTAL WARNING That He Will NEVER FORGET …
The truth is, if liberals wanted to stop so-called "gun violence", they could do it today with existing laws. Their refusal to even discuss enforcing existing laws is proof positive that their agenda had NOTHING to do with stopping crime.
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:27 pm
by TexasJohnBoy
Nah, commander in chief would rather talk down to the ignorant masses about how he knows about constitutional law.
Great video and message from the NRA.
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:41 pm
by MechAg94
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:58 am
by TomsTXCHL
That "warning" was dated Dec 5 but the video it references was posted to YouTube in October. The Luttrell video is from 9/11/2015.
I appreciate that some here want to raise awareness, but to present this as "breaking news" in the face of Obama's executive action is....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb209/bb209cec7e47f9bc5df7fbcb0e98b01fd854da04" alt="grumble :grumble"
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:46 pm
by RoyGBiv
TomsTXCHL wrote:That "warning" was dated Dec 5 but the video it references was posted to YouTube in October. The Luttrell video is from 9/11/2015.
I appreciate that some here want to raise awareness, but to present this as "breaking news" in the face of Obama's executive action is....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb209/bb209cec7e47f9bc5df7fbcb0e98b01fd854da04" alt="grumble :grumble"
+1
Diminishes credibility.
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 3:22 pm
by TomsTXCHL
Well I was grumbling about it because I was looking for Current/Timely information on the NRA's response to the EA, and this is all old news here despite the link's headline.
Re: Powerful message from the NRA
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:55 am
by SecurityGeek
I really don't understand the debate. We (not anyone here, specifically, but the people of this country) elected a crooked Chicago politician with a devout anti-gun record. Did anyone really think he would NOT go after guns first chance he got? Even if he had to lie, cheat, and steal to do it ("that's the Chicago way," to paraphrase Sean Connery)? We are getting exactly what was advertised. A vote for Clinton or Sanders in 2016 will ensure that this insanity continues unabated. Do we really want anti-gun leftists choosing Supreme Court justices? That thought scares me more than ten Obamas.