TexasCHLforum.com

“polarizing,”
“calculating,”
“disingenuous,”
“insincere,”
“ambitious,”
“inevitable,”
“entitled,”
“over confident,”
“secretive,
” will do anything to win,”
“represents the past,” and
“out of touch.”

Answer: They're all sexist -- at least when applied to Hillary.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ist-words/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

... and racist when applied to the current regime.

Middle Age Russ wrote:... and racist when applied to the current regime.

My favorite of the comments below the article expresses it so well... (emphasis mine)

''Sexist'' will become the new evil clarion cry of the left, moving their favorite word, ''Racist'' to 2nd place.

As always, liberal's use of such terms only serves to stop any discussion, criticism or analysis.

It seems that in any debate, when one person uses one of these terms to describe their opponent, then there is no further use in continuing the discussion. It's a conversation-stopper, and has no place in civil discourse.

And we will continue to ignore them, because they have become meaningless.

The Loonie Left wants to keep limiting free speech until the only two acceptable words left are "I submit".

misterlarry wrote:The Loonie Left wants to keep limiting free speech until the only two acceptable words left are "I submit".

I can think of other two word combinations that are more appropriate.

Middle Age Russ wrote:... and racist when applied to the current regime.

....and probably homophobic when used to describe the candidate-in-question....