Page 1 of 6

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:56 am
by baldeagle
Done and done.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:01 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:53 pm
by VMI77
More of that famous liberal "tolerance" on display.

Signed.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:07 pm
by Commander Cody
signed

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:54 pm
by Cedar Park Dad
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:13 pm
by Jumping Frog
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Tortious interference is attempting to interfere in the contractual relationship existing between two other parties.

Sure, they have free speech, but that neither justifies falsely yelling fire in a movie theater nor interfering in someone's contract.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:17 pm
by The Annoyed Man
I signed, and paid to support it.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:44 pm
by Dave09
signed

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:27 pm
by japacejr
Signed.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:46 pm
by jmra
Signed. #150 I believe.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:44 am
by txglock21
Signed...#180.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:19 am
by mr1337
Signed

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:36 am
by Cedar Park Dad
Jumping Frog wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Tortious interference is attempting to interfere in the contractual relationship existing between two other parties.

Sure, they have free speech, but that neither justifies falsely yelling fire in a movie theater nor interfering in someone's contract.
Which they are doing neither. Good luck with making that claim in court.