TexasCHLforum.com

I am not going to post any links to this. You can do a web search for it, but if you do you'll understand why I didn't post one.

Basically, MDA showed up at a "Come and Take It" (CATI) protest missing the top half of their clothes.

Sounds/ looks like MDA has some members of PETA in it.

Can anyone explain to me what the purpose of that is? I have never understood what it is they hope to accomplish by exposing themselves (other than publicity and lots of leering men.)

baldeagle wrote:Can anyone explain to me what the purpose of that is? I have never understood what it is they hope to accomplish by exposing themselves (other than publicity and lots of leering men.)

Apparently you haven't seen the pictures, I doubt there were many leering men.

I'm glas they did it, makes their side look nuttier than the pro 2A side.

I guess that totally redefines "Open Carry"

I only read the article.

However using 2A black squares to censor 1A rights in the photograph, seemed very funny, if not ironic.

jimlongley wrote:I guess that totally redefines "Open Carry"

Chas.

I doubt they could march very far without tripping "all over themselves".

Jumping Frog wrote:I am not going to post any links to this. You can do a web search for it, but if you do you'll understand why I didn't post one.

Basically, MDA showed up at a "Come and Take It" (CATI) protest missing the top half of their clothes.

That's not all they are missing.

I believe they are missing a few marbles upstairs.

Does this suggest that fully clothed women are in favor of gun rights?

I think you all misunderstand their very cunning approach: Normally, if a very attractive woman holds up a sign you won't even remember what the sign said - especially if they are topless. In the case of these ladies, your eyes immediately ricochet off of them like a .45 slug off Superman and immediately back onto their signs. Brilliant approach. I applaud their ingenuity.

I noticed that except for an Austin newspaper all the search links were to progun forums.

What does that say?

esxmarkc wrote:I think you all misunderstand their very cunning approach: Normally, if a very attractive woman holds up a sign you won't even remember what the sign said - especially if they are topless. In the case of these ladies, your eyes immediately ricochet off of them like a .45 slug off Superman and immediately back onto their signs. Brilliant approach. I applaud their ingenuity.

Ah, so that's the reason....I thought they forgot the mosquito repellent!

Austin weirdo's at their worse.

Although not as much as the rifle toting OC zealots, I think this may do the same thing for MDA. It dilutes the message. Puts them on the fringe.

Rrash wrote:Does this suggest that fully clothed women are in favor of gun rights?

I thought the message was only boobs oppose gun rights.