TexasCHLforum.com

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12 ... r-have-to/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Everyone better be thinking about what lines in the sand they are going to draw...because the time is quickly coming when you will be confronted with them. I would not have stayed in that state...period. The people who are registering should be ashamed.

Ditto California. I just posted a thread here: viewtopic.php?f=83&t=70690" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

In California's case, I don't think they have to retroactively register long guns already in possession, hence the rush to buy them before 1/1. But going forward, all such purchases will be registered with the state.

I would not register and the consequence are well thought of.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaa

The Annoyed Man wrote:Ditto California. I just posted a thread here: viewtopic.php?f=83&t=70690" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

In California's case, I don't think they have to retroactively register long guns already in possession, hence the rush to buy them before 1/1. But going forward, all such purchases will be registered with the state.

Just for grins:

Let's say that you wanted my .45 Eargensplitten and I wanted your .357 Loudenboomer and we agreed to trade both of our registered guns, one onto another. How would that work?