Salon.com: "Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:20 am
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_ho ... _american/
Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American
There is a double standard: White terrorists are dealt with as lone wolves, Islamists are existential threats
BY DAVID SIROTA
Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American
There is a double standard: White terrorists are dealt with as lone wolves, Islamists are existential threats
BY DAVID SIROTA
I post this in the Political Issues forum because it references mass shootings, which makes it at least peripherally related to RKBA, but also because it makes a huge moral equivalency, and laments the effects that pursuing terrorists might have on other agenda items for the left. I also post it because the eventual response of the left always seems to be: "devolve to charges of racial preferences when you've got nothing else in your quiver."As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.
This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.