TexasCHLforum.com

http://news.yahoo.com/national-gun-feve ... 24304.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Awwwwww, at first I thought this might be an article, but alas, it is an opinion piece...What hatred she has for the NRA and folks like us...

This writer should not be silenced. But all devices with Internet access should be banned to prevent her insane words from being read.

You know, for the children.

Was there a bayonet knife thingy?
I'm confused.
The first sentence and I'm lost already...

Never mind that Adam Lanza used a Bushmaster AR-15 assault-type rifle to rip apart the bodies of children at Sandy Hook Elementary School i

Perhaps I'll try using a rifle to clean fish or carve a turkey ... which part of a rifle is sharpest to rip apart stuff?


The first sentence confused me so badly that ..... I just had to stop reading.

I shot her an email, it was polite but to the point. She is a pulitzer prize winner, so if she even takes the time to answer my one and only question in the email, at least I'll have a reply email from a pulitzer prize winner.

I asked her what she planned to defend herself with in case one of these crazies had a flesh ripper pointed at her.

SATX-Scrub wrote:She is a pulitzer prize winner...

Well, she needs to pulitzer head out of ...

Pulitzer's, Nobel's, they sure seem to be handing those things out to just about anyone these days.

BTW, I thought the VTech guy only had a bunch of 10-round mags.

C-dub wrote:BTW, I thought the VTech guy only had a bunch of 10-round mags.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_massacre

The shooter waited one month after buying a Walther P22 pistol before he bought a second pistol, a Glock 19.[1] Cho used a 15-round magazine in the Glock and a 10-round magazine in the Walther.[

I'm not sure that Wikipedia gets it right on technical matters like this but I thought that I remembered that he had a Glock from the original stories and figured that it was probably a 15 round mag.

Quoting the article:

.....the U.S. Supreme Court has moved much further to the right....

The truth is that it has moved back toward the center......from the left. It's pretty stupid to say that a court which has 4 liberals, 4 conservatives, and one independent has "moved much further to the right." What a vapid idiot.

The Annoyed Man wrote:Quoting the article:

.....the U.S. Supreme Court has moved much further to the right....

The truth is that it has moved back toward the center......from the left. It's pretty stupid to say that a court which has 4 liberals, 4 conservatives, and one independent has "moved much further to the right." What a vapid idiot.

Moving to the center from the left, looks like moving to the right, when you're observing it from the FAR left. Just say'n.

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:Quoting the article:

.....the U.S. Supreme Court has moved much further to the right....

The truth is that it has moved back toward the center......from the left. It's pretty stupid to say that a court which has 4 liberals, 4 conservatives, and one independent has "moved much further to the right." What a vapid idiot.

Moving to the center from the left, looks like moving to the right, when you're observing it from the FAR left. Just say'n.

Well yeah, but that's only a bad thing if you're a communist agitator. If you're an American who loves the Constitution, even someone who is just a little bit left of center would not use that kind of inflammatory rhetoric. And fairness (a uniquely American trait) is not well represented in her comments.

Pawpaw wrote:

SATX-Scrub wrote:She is a pulitzer prize winner...

Well, she needs to pulitzer head out of ...

I had LOL overload!

SATX-Scrub wrote:

Pawpaw wrote:

SATX-Scrub wrote:She is a pulitzer prize winner...

Well, she needs to pulitzer head out of ...

I had LOL overload!

That's my Pop!

Pawpaw wrote:

SATX-Scrub wrote:She is a pulitzer prize winner...

Well, she needs to pulitzer head out of ...

Back to the kitchen to replace the coffee.