Page 1 of 1
Democrats want poor people to be victims
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:53 pm
by ClarkLZeuss
Excellent article by John Lott:
Legislation in at least 17 states around the country is aimed specifically at making it more costly to own a gun. Democrats are voting in mass against exempting the poor from fees when it comes to guns...Democrats seem to think that waiting for police to arrive from a 911 call is good enough for the poor.
Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/ ... z2NXsaQAp1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:55 pm
by Dadtodabone
Mr. Lott takes Texas to task on handgun licensing, where none is required, and mistakes the CHL for general licensing. While I respect Mr. Lott and his research in general, this is a glaring error that undermines my confidence in him.
Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:43 pm
by tommyg
I read the article it spacifically said concealed handgun permits not permits to purchase.
I think the article is right only the wording is confusing
Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:28 pm
by baldeagle
Dadtodabone wrote:Mr. Lott takes Texas to task on handgun licensing, where none is required, and mistakes the CHL for general licensing. While I respect Mr. Lott and his research in general, this is a glaring error that undermines my confidence in him.
You misread it. Here's what he wrote:
The impact of fees and training is no different with concealed handgun permits. Texas has four times Indiana’s population, yet it has issued only slightly more permits, 584,000 versus 450,000. The difference is not because Texans like guns less. It is simply that Texans have a more difficult time getting permits. The fee for getting a 5-year permit in Texas is $140, but only $65 in Indiana. Similarly, Texas requires 10 hours of training and Indiana doesn't require any.
He uses the word "permit" but he's referring to the Texas CHL license.
More importantly, his point is not only valid, but it is a HUGE opening for Republicans. Pointing out that the Democrats are deliberately and consciously making it more difficult for poor people to defend themselves could drive a serious wedge between Democrats and their main constituencies and open up the possibility, in the minds of the poor, that the Democrats really DON'T have their best interests at heart.