TexasCHLforum.com

Great video on the Liberal mind. long watch but totally worth it.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Chris Costa linked to this 90 minute long video. Tin-foil hat or no?

AGENDA: Grinding America Down (Full Movie) FREE to watch for a limited time.
http://vimeo.com/52009124

Answer: Modern liberals DON'T think, they feel.

What happens is, they are indoctrinated into what I call a "cult of indiscriminateness." The way the elite does this is by teaching our children, start­ing with the very young, that rational and moral thought is an act of bigotry; that no matter how sin­cerely you may seek to gather the facts, no matter how earnestly you may look at the evidence, no matter how disciplined you may try to be in your reasoning, your conclusion is going to be so tainted by your personal bigotries, by your upbringing, by your religion, by the color of your skin, by the nation of your great-great-great-great-great grandfa­ther's birth; that no matter what your conclusion, it is useless. It is nothing other than the reflection of your bigotries, and the only way to eliminate bigot­ry is to eliminate rational thought.

There's a brilliant book out there called The Clos­ing of the American Mind by Professor Allan Bloom. Professor Bloom was trying to figure out in the 1980s why his students were suddenly so stupid, and what he came to was the realization, the recog­nition, that they'd been raised to believe that indis­criminateness is a moral imperative because its opposite is the evil of having discriminated. I para­phrase this in my own works: "In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate."

I'll give you an example. At the airports, in order not to discriminate, we have to intentionally make ourselves stupid. We have to pretend we don't know things we do know, and we have to pretend that the next person who is likely to blow up an airplane is as much the 87-year-old Swedish great-great-grand­mother as those four 27-year-old imams newly arrived from Syria screaming "Allahu Akbar!" just before they board the plane. In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate.

I think he hit the nail on the head! The modern liberal has done an amazing job over the decades of using propaganda and leftist ideologies in the schools and Universities to brainwash our young generation into believing this. This is why that man in the White House could do such a horrible job and still get re-elected.

Modern Liberals have the mindset of a five year old - absent of critical and rational judgement (according to Mr. Sayet):

I absolutely believe that they believe that they are working toward "the good." The problem is that you've eliminated critical, rational judgment; you've eliminated the ability to tell the difference between what works and what doesn't work; you're coming from the mindset of a five-year-old.

When I was five years old, the New York World's Fair closed up in my neighborhood, down the street from me, and I insisted that my father buy the monorail that went around the park because I want­ed to put it up alongside the Long Island Express­way and ease congestion and pollution because I was a liberal kid. He explained to me in grown-up fashion that we couldn't afford it and, technically, there were problems like getting the rights of way, creating a bureaucracy, etc.

When you have a conversation with a Modern Liberal about health care, there's no doubt that their goal is as good as mine was: curing air pollu­tion or curing everybody's health problems. But if you don't have the grown-up sense to be able to discuss how, what's the reality, what's the truth, you can't have a conversation where you make the world a better place. It's all fantasy at that point. Again, you're dealing with a five-year-old, so of course she wants to make the world a better place. Very, very few of us don't.

It's a matter of having given up the ability to dis­criminate: (a) they can't bring it about because it's a childish conversation; and (b) when you have to make the decisions about who gets certain things-- for example, health care, welfare, or illegal aliens-- certain decisions have to be made about who quali­fies for it, and when you're just going through indis­criminately giving all these benefits, then you're actually going to be assisting that which is most failed because they're the ones who are going to be most in need.

longhorn_92 wrote:

What happens is, they are indoctrinated into what I call a "cult of indiscriminateness." The way the elite does this is by teaching our children, start­ing with the very young, that rational and moral thought is an act of bigotry; that no matter how sin­cerely you may seek to gather the facts, no matter how earnestly you may look at the evidence, no matter how disciplined you may try to be in your reasoning, your conclusion is going to be so tainted by your personal bigotries, by your upbringing, by your religion, by the color of your skin, by the nation of your great-great-great-great-great grandfa­ther's birth; that no matter what your conclusion, it is useless. It is nothing other than the reflection of your bigotries, and the only way to eliminate bigot­ry is to eliminate rational thought.

There's a brilliant book out there called The Clos­ing of the American Mind by Professor Allan Bloom. Professor Bloom was trying to figure out in the 1980s why his students were suddenly so stupid, and what he came to was the realization, the recog­nition, that they'd been raised to believe that indis­criminateness is a moral imperative because its opposite is the evil of having discriminated. I para­phrase this in my own works: "In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate."

I'll give you an example. At the airports, in order not to discriminate, we have to intentionally make ourselves stupid. We have to pretend we don't know things we do know, and we have to pretend that the next person who is likely to blow up an airplane is as much the 87-year-old Swedish great-great-grand­mother as those four 27-year-old imams newly arrived from Syria screaming "Allahu Akbar!" just before they board the plane. In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate.

I think he hit the nail on the head! The modern liberal has done an amazing job over the decades of using propaganda and leftist ideologies in the schools and Universities to brainwash our young generation into believing this. This is why that man in the White House could do such a horrible job and still get re-elected.

Modern Liberals have the mindset of a five year old - absent of critical and rational judgement (according to Mr. Sayet):

I absolutely believe that they believe that they are working toward "the good." The problem is that you've eliminated critical, rational judgment; you've eliminated the ability to tell the difference between what works and what doesn't work; you're coming from the mindset of a five-year-old.

When I was five years old, the New York World's Fair closed up in my neighborhood, down the street from me, and I insisted that my father buy the monorail that went around the park because I want­ed to put it up alongside the Long Island Express­way and ease congestion and pollution because I was a liberal kid. He explained to me in grown-up fashion that we couldn't afford it and, technically, there were problems like getting the rights of way, creating a bureaucracy, etc.

When you have a conversation with a Modern Liberal about health care, there's no doubt that their goal is as good as mine was: curing air pollu­tion or curing everybody's health problems. But if you don't have the grown-up sense to be able to discuss how, what's the reality, what's the truth, you can't have a conversation where you make the world a better place. It's all fantasy at that point. Again, you're dealing with a five-year-old, so of course she wants to make the world a better place. Very, very few of us don't.

It's a matter of having given up the ability to dis­criminate: (a) they can't bring it about because it's a childish conversation; and (b) when you have to make the decisions about who gets certain things-- for example, health care, welfare, or illegal aliens-- certain decisions have to be made about who quali­fies for it, and when you're just going through indis­criminately giving all these benefits, then you're actually going to be assisting that which is most failed because they're the ones who are going to be most in need.

While there is some truth to it, and while it is perhaps a helpful way of explaining something illogical, the fact is, liberals do indeed discriminate. Their "rules" don't apply to them, nor do their rules apply to their favored groups (at least for so long as they haven't acquired absolute power and such groups remain useful). Not only do liberals discriminate, they often discriminate in the same ways as those whom they discriminate against. The pretense of being indiscriminate in some ways is merely a tool to divide and conquer.

sjfcontrol wrote:Answer: Modern liberals DON'T think, they feel.

man, that's exactly what I was going to say!

I am embarrassed to show you what I have just endured in the process of completing the mandatory 25 hours of Continuing Legal Education. One of the requirements is at least 1 hour credit on the subject of "Elimination of Bias."

As a result of this experience, I may be developing a bias against liberal idiots.

Liberal-progressives/leftists/collectivists don't want to allow any dissent or thought or attitude or direction...unless it is THEIR dissent, THEIR thought, THEIR attitude, THEIR direction. While I believe that a good chunk of the political left is made up of "useful idiots", the core of folks that drive them know full well just what they are doing...and they know the end goal they have in mind, too. And it has very little to do with ACTUAL socialism or any other system of "sharing" and much more to do with elitist oligarchy. Then they can FORCE everyone else to be "equal". To stand up to these people, you have to not mind getting your feelings hurt as they call you "racist", "bigot", "homophobe", and so much worse. Its all cover for their schemes, to stifle any argument, and as I have stated on here before, right out of Saul Alinsky's playbook. Read his "Rules" and see for yourself...look up the goals of "cultural Marxists"...and finally, think about the fact that V.I. Lenin was trained and sent to Russia to foment rebellion and knock them out of the war by the Imperial German High Command...the whole leftist movement is a sham, a psyop, and deadly in intent, right from the start.

The truth of this world is that SOMEONE is always going to be running things, and I'd rather have "greedy" capitalists who don't care a bit about me in charge vs leftists who pretend to "care".

"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." John Kenneth Galbraith

Heartland Patriot wrote:Liberal-progressives/leftists/collectivists don't want to allow any dissent or thought or attitude or direction...unless it is THEIR dissent, THEIR thought, THEIR attitude, THEIR direction. While I believe that a good chunk of the political left is made up of "useful idiots", the core of folks that drive them know full well just what they are doing...and they know the end goal they have in mind, too. And it has very little to do with ACTUAL socialism or any other system of "sharing" and much more to do with elitist oligarchy. Then they can FORCE everyone else to be "equal". To stand up to these people, you have to not mind getting your feelings hurt as they call you "racist", "bigot", "homophobe", and so much worse. Its all cover for their schemes, to stifle any argument, and as I have stated on here before, right out of Saul Alinsky's playbook. Read his "Rules" and see for yourself...look up the goals of "cultural Marxists"...and finally, think about the fact that V.I. Lenin was trained and sent to Russia to foment rebellion and knock them out of the war by the Imperial German High Command...the whole leftist movement is a sham, a psyop, and deadly in intent, right from the start.

The truth of this world is that SOMEONE is always going to be running things, and I'd rather have "greedy" capitalists who don't care a bit about me in charge vs leftists who pretend to "care".

Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

I am currently reading Ann Coulter's book Demonic - How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.

Great insight into understanding the democrat method of mob rule.

Anygunanywhere

psijac wrote:Great video on the Liberal mind. long watch but totally worth it.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Didn't a radio show host write a book thats premise was liberalism was mental disease?

Andrew wrote:

psijac wrote:Great video on the Liberal mind. long watch but totally worth it.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Didn't a radio show host write a book thats premise was liberalism was mental disease?

Yes, Dr. Michael Savage....he is a bit of a nut, but very intelligent. "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"

jdhz28 wrote:

Andrew wrote:

psijac wrote:Great video on the Liberal mind. long watch but totally worth it.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Didn't a radio show host write a book thats premise was liberalism was mental disease?

Yes, Dr. Michael Savage....he is a bit of a nut, but very intelligent. "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"

Savage is the best out there, IMHO. And I would say "nut", I would say eccentric. Alex Jones is a nut.

Redneck_Buddha wrote:

jdhz28 wrote:

Andrew wrote:

psijac wrote:Great video on the Liberal mind. long watch but totally worth it.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Didn't a radio show host write a book thats premise was liberalism was mental disease?

Yes, Dr. Michael Savage....he is a bit of a nut, but very intelligent. "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"

Savage is the best out there, IMHO. And I would say "nut", I would say eccentric. Alex Jones is a nut.

He does twist off in a fit of rage the same way Jones does, but Savage actually has some serious credentials...