Shoot to "ill"

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
tomc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Dallas

Shoot to "ill"

#1

Post by tomc »

If I were a New York politician, this is what I would want as law!

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/cops ... qY85ZHJSYI

Excerpt:
"The bill -- drafted in the wake of Sean Bell's controversial police shooting death -- would force officers to use their weapons "with the intent to stop, rather than kill" a suspect. They would be mandated to "shoot a suspect in the arm or the leg." "
be safe,
be prepared,
tomc
User avatar

TxRVer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:21 pm
Location: Red Oak

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#2

Post by TxRVer »

Not everyone can shoot like the Lone Ranger. ;-)
Charlie

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#3

Post by RPB »

I can see a NYC officer ... Yes your honor, I shot him in both arms and both legs and he still kept shooting at people, so next I tried to just shoot his eyes so he couldn't see to keep aiming and keep shooting people .... perhaps those overpenetrated?
Last edited by RPB on Tue May 25, 2010 6:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#4

Post by WildBill »

tomc wrote:They would be mandated to "shoot a suspect in the arm or the leg."
Or, if the subject was armed, shoot the gun out of his hand. ;-)
NRA Endowment Member

Topic author
tomc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#5

Post by tomc »

TxRVer wrote:Not everyone can shoot like the Lone Ranger. ;-)
Yeah! Especially NY cops.
be safe,
be prepared,
tomc
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26870
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#6

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Of course, the bill is outrageous. But I remind myself that we don't shoot to kill either. We shoot to stop. Sometimes that results in a dead perp. But I'll tell anyone who'll listen that I shot to stop the threat, not to kill it. Verbal political correctness is a pain in the posterior, but if it keeps me out of jail, I'm good with it.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

BobCat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: East Bernard, TX

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#7

Post by BobCat »

TAM, I think it is more than just verbal PC. I don't know you personally, just from the Forum, but I don't think you - or anyone else here - is intent on "killing" anyone.

If you have to shoot, it means you are under attack and you're shooting to stop the attack.

With that said, of course the requirement to aim for a limb is absurd. Nobody can reliably hit a small moving target like an arm or leg, in the heat of the moment - and a gunshot would to the arm can hit the brachial artery, to the leg the femoral artery, and the person will bleed out in short order. Shooting an extremity is not necessarily non-lethal, besides being difficult.

Regards,
Andrew
Retractable claws; the *original* concealed carry
User avatar

JJVP
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#8

Post by JJVP »

"Under present NYPD training, cops are taught to shoot at the center of their target and fire their weapon until the threat has been stopped."

"In fact, NYPD officers and detectives hit their targets only 17 percent of the time because of the incredibly stressful circumstances surrounding a shooting."

They can only hit the targets 17 percent of the time shooting at center mass. Trying to shoot an arm or leg they might hit their target 0.17 percent of the time. Where all the idiots in NY come from? :roll:

"Vice President Joe Biden, who scoffed and suggested it be dubbed "The John Wayne Bill" because it demands sharp-shooting skills of the kind only seen in movies."

I never thought I would agree with Biden on anything. Guess I was wrong. :lol:
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26870
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#9

Post by The Annoyed Man »

BobCat wrote:TAM, I think it is more than just verbal PC. I don't know you personally, just from the Forum, but I don't think you - or anyone else here - is intent on "killing" anyone.

If you have to shoot, it means you are under attack and you're shooting to stop the attack.

With that said, of course the requirement to aim for a limb is absurd. Nobody can reliably hit a small moving target like an arm or leg, in the heat of the moment - and a gunshot would to the arm can hit the brachial artery, to the leg the femoral artery, and the person will bleed out in short order. Shooting an extremity is not necessarily non-lethal, besides being difficult.

Regards,
Andrew
You are absolutely correct, in all points.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#10

Post by 74novaman »

JJVP wrote:
"Vice President Joe Biden, who scoffed and suggested it be dubbed "The John Wayne Bill" because it demands sharp-shooting skills of the kind only seen in movies."

I never thought I would agree with Biden on anything. Guess I was wrong. :lol:
I'm with you. That is pretty funny. "rlol"
TANSTAAFL

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#11

Post by RPB »

That bill doesn't go far enough !!! :rules:
Arm or leg could be fatal.
Really, they should only shoot off the trigger fingers, that would stop the threat.
(Unless a bad guy can use his toes to pull a trigger, if so, shoot the trigger toe off too.)
Alternatively, issue NERF bullets soaked in jalepeno juice and aim for the eyes... then they can't collect disability for the missing fingers later.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#12

Post by jimlongley »

Boy, they left a whole bunch of the Penal Code out.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#13

Post by SQLGeek »

Who knew that Sylvester Stallone movie, Demolition Man, would prove to be prophetic.

"We're police officers! We're not trained to handle this kind of violence!"
Psalm 91:2
User avatar

VoiceofReason
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1748
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#14

Post by VoiceofReason »

And the comments,

“This is about training officers correctly to take a shot or two stop for a split second and take more shots AS NEEDED”. "rlol"

Why would anyone want to be a cop in New York?
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26870
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shoot to "ill"

#15

Post by The Annoyed Man »

VoiceofReason wrote:And the comments,

“This is about training officers correctly to take a shot or two stop for a split second and take more shots AS NEEDED”. "rlol"

Why would anyone want to be a cop in New York?
How about, "your honor, I shot him in the center of mass because I ascertained that aiming for a leg or arm would unnecessarily endanger civilians in the vicinity. Once he was down and I could do so without endangering any innocents, I shot him in the in foot so he couldn't get up and run away."
:evil2:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”