Not likely to happen under the UniParty though. As an email I received today said, "It's because Democrats want to grow the welfare state, and Republicans want to grow the military-industrial complex." I'd add to that they both want to grow the surveillance state to ensure their side continues to grow.
Re: DGU data by FBI is wrong
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 5:08 pm
by Paladin
The data has long showed if you do not resist a criminal you still have 25% chance of injury and the criminal will complete the crime 89% of the time.
Armed resistance only has a 6% chance of injury to you with the criminal completing their crime only 31% of the time.
Re: DGU data by FBI is wrong
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 6:37 pm
by The Annoyed Man
Another "winner" from the Security Branch of the DNC (AKA “FBI”).
Re: DGU data by FBI is wrong
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 8:07 pm
by philip964
Paladin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 5:08 pm
The data has long showed if you do not resist a criminal you still have 25% chance of injury and the criminal will complete the crime 89% of the time.
Armed resistance only has a 6% chance of injury to you with the criminal completing their crime only 31% of the time.
It seems if you are unarmed and your robber is armed, in most cases, if you resist you end up dead. There are exceptions, one occurred in Houston recently.
Paladin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 5:08 pm
The data has long showed if you do not resist a criminal you still have 25% chance of injury and the criminal will complete the crime 89% of the time.
Armed resistance only has a 6% chance of injury to you with the criminal completing their crime only 31% of the time.
It seems if you are unarmed and your robber is armed, in most cases, if you resist you end up dead. There are exceptions, one occurred in Houston recently.