TexasCHLforum.com

ATF Says The Quiet Part Out Loud

the Los Angeles branch of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives tweeted that the $200 tax stamp on firearms and accessories regulated by the National Firearms Act was "quite prohibitive at the time, which was the goal of the NFA."

And there we have it, NFA gun grabbing isn't about safety

Paladin wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 9:10 pm ATF Says The Quiet Part Out Loud

the Los Angeles branch of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives tweeted that the $200 tax stamp on firearms and accessories regulated by the National Firearms Act was "quite prohibitive at the time, which was the goal of the NFA."

And there we have it, NFA gun grabbing isn't about safety

'Course it wasn't about safety. A suppressor on your gun to protect your hearing and minimalize disturbance to others and to wildlife is solely about public safely? Having a forearm brace on an AR-15 pistol is solely about public safety?

Wonder how long the NFA will last under the Bruin doctrine?

Vol Texan wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 10:20 am Wonder how long the NFA will last under the Bruin doctrine?

With the ATF putting out that kind of information... not long.

Vol Texan wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 10:20 am Wonder how long the NFA will last under the Bruin doctrine?

I was not aware that the Boston Bruins had any hand in the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. :-)

SIA