Enemy combatants

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

txglock21
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:39 am
Location: Garland, TX.

Re: Enemy combatants

#31

Post by txglock21 »

:iagree: Well said! Don't worry, he will get what is coming to him according to the laws of the land. :patriot:
"Laugh about everything or cry about nothing."
NRA Life Member & TSRA Member/ Former USAF

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Enemy combatants

#32

Post by Dave2 »

TexasGal wrote:If we want our government to stand up for our rights under the Constitution, but not for his rights under the same document, then just what does it mean to be a US citizen? No matter what he has done (and I am just as upset as the next person), he is still a US citizen with the right to a trial. The right to hear the evidence against him. To be tried, convicted, and sentenced. If there is ample evidence he did what he is accused of, then there should be no problem getting him convicted. If we cry for his rights to be ignored, then what happens to ours? The hitch I see is just who wants to sit on a jury that gives the death sentence to terrorist. Courageous persons would be needed.
:iagree: :patriot:
If we can't stick to our principles in tough times, then what's the point of having them?
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

G26ster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Enemy combatants

#33

Post by G26ster »

I didn't see anyone calling for no trial. He would get a civil trial even as an Enemy Combatant, and that declaration does not strip him of due process, at least according to the SCOTUS (8-1).

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

hounddog
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:52 pm
Location: Longview, Texas

Re: Enemy combatants

#34

Post by hounddog »

Those jokers aren't the sharpest tools in the shed, but they're not totally stupid either. They may have figured out a great Trojan Horse. Using our own rule book, they can work their way into our beautiful country, and on paper be a citizen. But if you don't have it in your heart, you're just fartin' in the wind. Everyone knows that most of them hate our guts. They will stoop to the lowest of lows to weasle in here and kill as many of us as they can. I love our country, but I don't ever remember things being as crappy as they are right now. I don't follow a god that teaches you to kill everyone that won't switch to your way of thinking. Those people have patience, as long as they get to wreak havoc on us. They know that if they become citizens, they will be afforded our rights, and waste our taxpayer money, dragging their crap through our court systems. I try to live a Christian life, but I have to call a spade a spade. Sorry to get so wound up, just had to vent a little.
Larry D. Price
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Enemy combatants

#35

Post by Purplehood »

jimlongley wrote:[
Purplehood wrote:
jocat54 wrote:
texanjoker wrote:It is a tough call, but he is a US citizen. At what point do we say you do or do not receive the Bill of Rights? They made the decision for criminal court so that is out.

Not tough for me....he lost ALL rights when he set that bomb off.
So how would you handle someone born and raised in the USA?
Just the same way. Timothy McVeigh proved he didn't want to be a citizen, so grant him his wish, after conviction, and Hassan is worse, HE should be declared an enemy combatant, a saboteur, and an enemy agent and stood against a wall and shot, upon conviction.
That seems to be a rather simplistic response. Shouldn't we do the exact same things to every mass-murderer, serial-killer/rapist in the USA? Or do we just tailor our justice towards certain categories of 'bad-guys'?
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”