![I Agree :iagree:](./images/smilies/iagree.gif)
![Patriot :patriot:](./images/smilies/patriot.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
TexasGal wrote:If we want our government to stand up for our rights under the Constitution, but not for his rights under the same document, then just what does it mean to be a US citizen? No matter what he has done (and I am just as upset as the next person), he is still a US citizen with the right to a trial. The right to hear the evidence against him. To be tried, convicted, and sentenced. If there is ample evidence he did what he is accused of, then there should be no problem getting him convicted. If we cry for his rights to be ignored, then what happens to ours? The hitch I see is just who wants to sit on a jury that gives the death sentence to terrorist. Courageous persons would be needed.
That seems to be a rather simplistic response. Shouldn't we do the exact same things to every mass-murderer, serial-killer/rapist in the USA? Or do we just tailor our justice towards certain categories of 'bad-guys'?jimlongley wrote:[Just the same way. Timothy McVeigh proved he didn't want to be a citizen, so grant him his wish, after conviction, and Hassan is worse, HE should be declared an enemy combatant, a saboteur, and an enemy agent and stood against a wall and shot, upon conviction.Purplehood wrote:So how would you handle someone born and raised in the USA?jocat54 wrote:texanjoker wrote:It is a tough call, but he is a US citizen. At what point do we say you do or do not receive the Bill of Rights? They made the decision for criminal court so that is out.
Not tough for me....he lost ALL rights when he set that bomb off.