Proposed rule change that would bar "gun talk" on line?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

LSUTiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Proposed rule change that would bar "gun talk" on line?

#16

Post by LSUTiger »

Let history be your guide, when freedom of speech is suppressed and guns confiscated, its all over.

Most recent history I can think of is modern day Venezuela. From Democracy (believe it or not they used to be a Constitutional Republic much like we used to be) to Dictatorship.
Chance favors the prepared. Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
User avatar

RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Proposed rule change that would bar "gun talk" on line?

#17

Post by RogueUSMC »

Law abiding citizens are harder to control than criminals...solution: make the law abiding citizens criminals...
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Proposed rule change that would bar "gun talk" on line?

#18

Post by VMI77 »

http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/10/oba ... ast-month/
The Obama administration’s latest anti-gun salvo isn’t about reducing gun violence or stopping the export of dangerous weapons, it’s about pure retaliation against a non-profit that sued the government in federal court last month.

Defense Distributed, a pro-Second Amendment non-profit organization that provides blueprints, plans, and machinery to fabricate or finish firearm components, has been at war with the State Department for nearly two years.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Proposed rule change that would bar "gun talk" on line?

#19

Post by XinTX »

MechAg94 wrote:
VMI77 wrote:One obvious target here is 3D printing.
That is one. I imagine the intent is to make the rule as broad as possible so they can target whoever they want. Which is the intent of most of the numerous regulations in place.
Goes along with a signature line quote I use on a board (or the one I use here as well):
“The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” Ayn Rand
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”