I hope it isn't the case, but I think this is the last time we will hear publically anyway about this incident. Nothing will happen. As another poster points out, she was told how to get her weapon returned to her and she has it. As for a "crime" being committed -- if it is a crime to block another car in a parking space, stalling for time until Police arrive, if that's a crime, yes, she should have been arrested and her weapon confiscated.
That's not me talking, that's the law.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62fa/f62fa4152a225c3faecfce6e3dd764f3f6e48eda" alt="rules :rules:"
If Officer Hill didn't want to follow the law, then he needs to find another line of work. Based on the parking space crime theory, he didn't follow the law anyway. He either didn't arrest her for committing a crime, justifying the confiscation, OR, there was no crime committed, and he confiscated her weapon and broke the law anyway. Either way it seems, he exercised an extreme error in judgment. Extreme you say? Yes. One could make a case he violated her second, fourth, and probably sixth amendments to the Constitution. As I said, the APD internal unit has it, there will be no more public disclosures of the investigation, Officer Hill will receive no punishment, this incident is done. On another note -- it's Election runoff day, go exercise your right to vote.