Basically, MDA showed up at a "Come and Take It" (CATI) protest missing the top half of their clothes.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Apparently you haven't seen the pictures, I doubt there were many leering men.baldeagle wrote:Can anyone explain to me what the purpose of that is? I have never understood what it is they hope to accomplish by exposing themselves (other than publicity and lots of leering men.)
jimlongley wrote:I guess that totally redefines "Open Carry"
That's not all they are missing.Jumping Frog wrote:I am not going to post any links to this. You can do a web search for it, but if you do you'll understand why I didn't post one.
Basically, MDA showed up at a "Come and Take It" (CATI) protest missing the top half of their clothes.![]()
![]()
Ah, so that's the reason....I thought they forgot the mosquito repellent!esxmarkc wrote:I think you all misunderstand their very cunning approach: Normally, if a very attractive woman holds up a sign you won't even remember what the sign said - especially if they are topless. In the case of these ladies, your eyes immediately ricochet off of them like a .45 slug off Superman and immediately back onto their signs. Brilliant approach. I applaud their ingenuity.
I thought the message was only boobs oppose gun rights.Rrash wrote:Does this suggest that fully clothed women are in favor of gun rights?