Anti-Gun Blog Advocates Criminal Activity

[McKnife]

Anti-Gun Blog Advocates Criminal Activity in Response to Open-Carry Demonstrators:

http://www.pqed.org/2014/06/how-should- ... carry.html

"The questions that concerns me now is how we bystanders should react when people come into a store with guns. There really is no legitimate way of determining intent. Even if the people with guns are carrying a sign claiming to be activists (which they do not do), they could be lying, just setting us all up for slaughter. And since there is no way to know what is on their minds, all we have are our instincts, but as we all should know, our instincts are often racist, classist, and frequently mistaken. So, what should we do?

My proposal is as follows: we should all leave. Immediately. Leave the food on the table in the restaurant. Leave the groceries in the cart, in the aisle. Stop talking or engaging in the exchange. Just leave, unceremoniously, and fast.

But here is the key part: don’t pay. Stopping to pay in the presence of a person with a gun means risking your and your loved ones’ lives; money shouldn’t trump this. It doesn’t matter if you ate the meal. It doesn’t matter if you’ve just received food from the deli counter that can’t be resold. It doesn’t matter if you just got a haircut. Leave. If the business loses money, so be it. They can make the activists pay."

It would be entertaining to see them act on this "proposal," because it sounds like an awfully poor excuse for criminal theft... and if you want an even better understanding of the enemy, read the comments on the website. Happy Independence Day, All!

[JP171]

I think here in texas its called defrauding an innkeeper and is a felony

[Seburiel]

Texas Penal Code - Section 31.04. Theft Of Service
I don't believe there is a criminal statute called 'defrauding of an Innkeeper'.
But I may be incorrect.









Edited to correct.

[gringo pistolero]

It's more likely for a store to be robbed by someone wearing a hoodie but never mind the facts.

[CoolBreeze]

They have also made statements hoping a CHL will mistakenly shoot an OC so they can bring the whole thing down. Despicable. I wish no harm to anyone. Including the anti-gun sentiment.

[VoiceofReason]

“Philosophical Questions Every Day” I love how this pseudo intellectual interprets the first and second amendments.

“If the second amendment is as important as people claim, then people should be willing to pay for it. God knows, free speech is tremendously expensive. If it weren’t, I’d be reading this on ESPN during prime time, not posting this on Blogger”