Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

karder
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1380
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:14 pm
Location: El Paso

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#16

Post by karder »

America is plagued by a wave of social progressives that are so determined to make the world the way they want it to be, that they live in complete denial about the way the world really is. These dimwits grew up in upper middle class homes, went to a school where everyone got a trophy, went to a liberal college and got a degree in humanities and now have their blogs where they disseminate nonsensical ideas without an inkling of how the natural world works. These folks couldn't make it an hour without the internet or their iphones and blame societies woes on guns and a "lack of education". Men need education so that they will stop being violent. Idiotic. What education are they talking about? How many criminals, when pressed, don't know what they are doing is wrong? They may not care, but they know.
Some of histories most violent and evil men were very well educated, and the punk who is going to knife you for the $5 bucks in your wallet isn't a GED away from morality. I suppose that a society who has stomped out the concept of sin, must grasp for answers in some strange places. A man with a vacant soul is a dangerous animal and the more education he has, the more dangerous he is. I suggest all the ladies and fellows prepare themselves in the event we encounter one.
“While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.” ― Samuel Adams

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#17

Post by MechAg94 »

Those women are not feminists in the traditional sense. They are liberal sell outs.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#18

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Selina Kyle wrote:
TexasGal wrote:On the way to see my Dad for Father's Day, we passed a woman walking all alone on a remote country road a long ways from the nearest house. I was concerned for her so we turned round to offer her a ride. She declined and explained she is training for a long distance race. I point blank asked her if she had any means of self defense on her and she smiled with that look we CHL'ers know. Yes. I said good! Every woman should have bad guy repellent on them at all times. If only more women would wake up and admit all the far left misguided deluded dreaming on earth will not help them when the predator singles them out in the here and now. I agree we should not have to fear any harm from anyone but women have never lived in that world and I do not believe we ever will.
I agree - sadly, I don't think we will ever be safe here on earth. I'm anxiously awaiting my plastic. I had to run out late last night for a family emergency, and I was thinking how much better I would have felt with it on my body.....not tucked away in my car.
The thing I hope that most women would remember is that, while I agree that women have unfortunately been victims of male brutality over the centuries, for every predator out there, there are hundreds if not thousands of decent, kind, honorable men who are as interested in protecting you and your virtues as you are.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Jim Beaux
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1356
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:55 pm

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#19

Post by Jim Beaux »

VMI77 wrote:In fact, women who do defend themselves are apparently an affront to feminists.

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/miss-neva ... f-defense/

Miss USA shouldn't be telling women to learn how to defend themselves according to "progressive" utopianists.
Women Should not have to defend themselves…. Men need education.
Let's hope Nevada uses her media tour to reiterate that teaching girls self defense is NOT the best way to protect against assault
People who are this delusional are simply incapable of rational thought. These mental cases not only don't want women to have guns, they don't even want them to fight off an attacker by any means. Well, if someone tries to rape my wife, they're going to get shot.

I hope these liberwhacks practice what they preach - it will be a great improvement to the gene pool. :lol:
“In the world of lies, truth-telling is a hanging offense"
~Unknown
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#20

Post by baldeagle »

VMI77 wrote:In fact, women who do defend themselves are apparently an affront to feminists.

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/miss-neva ... f-defense/

Miss USA shouldn't be telling women to learn how to defend themselves according to "progressive" utopianists.
Women Should not have to defend themselves…. Men need education.
Let's hope Nevada uses her media tour to reiterate that teaching girls self defense is NOT the best way to protect against assault
People who are this delusional are simply incapable of rational thought. These mental cases not only don't want women to have guns, they don't even want them to fight off an attacker by any means. Well, if someone tries to rape my wife, they're going to get shot.
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this. If women shouldn't have to defend themselves, then, logically, the only ones who can is men. Yet feminists claim they don't need men. It's a real head scratcher.

OTOH, if what they're saying is that there shouldn't be any violence in the world, they demonstrate a naivete that forces one to the conclusion that without men around to protect them they are sitting ducks. Yet they claim they are just as capable as men, which means they should be able to defend themselves and not need anyone else to do it. Another headscratcher.

Logic, apparently, is not their long suit.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

ShootDontTalk
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Near Houston

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#21

Post by ShootDontTalk »

baldeagle wrote: Logic, apparently, is not their long suit.
Neither is reality.....but wait....Doesn't Hollywierd depict a 110 lb woman as physically more that a match for any dozen NFL linebacker-types bent on mayhem?
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!
Eli Wallach on concealed carry while taking a bubble bath
User avatar

Topic author
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Feminists: women shouldn't have to defend themselves

#22

Post by VMI77 »

MechAg94 wrote:Those women are not feminists in the traditional sense. They are liberal sell outs.
Can you elaborate? Maybe give some examples of who you consider traditional feminists? I'd put Camille Paglia in that category, and while I can think of some others, they're not counted by the feminist "leadership" or the media because they're libertarian/conservative. My youngest recently graduated from UT and he had to take a course in "feminism." The radical nonsense spouted in his class was as rabid and insane as any rabid and insane political philosophy I've ever heard. The feminist movement was getting a lot of attention when I was young...and that movement is what I tend to associate with "traditional" feminism. What we see to day is the logical extension of that irrational and anti-human philosophy. As I remember it at the time though, there was a large consensus that "feminism" was just attention for ugly and bitter single women living alone with lots of cats.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”