Do you support term limits for national / state offices?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Do you support term limits on state / national elected offices?

Yes
32
62%
No
11
21%
Only in very limited cases (e.g. President, Governor, or other)
6
12%
Undecided / Still thinking about it
3
6%
 
Total votes: 52

User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Do you support term limits for national / state offices?

#31

Post by baldeagle »

EconDoc wrote:
baldeagle wrote:We used to have term limits for Senators. Then they passed the 17th Amendment and destroyed the system of checks and balances. Representatives are as close as we come to democratic elections. They represent the voice of the people. Senators were supposed to represent the voice of the State. They were appointed by the Governor or Legislature and represented the party that was in power at the time. When the Governor or Legislature changed, the Senator might change too. Furthermore, Senators were not beholden to the people to represent their views. Now both houses are about the next election.

Repeal the 17th Amendment. Then let's see what impact that has before we make any further changes.

I find the notion of being afraid of term limits rather quaint. It's like saying, I love this guy that represents me now and there's not another person in my state who could do as well as he does. Really? How do you know if you don't try? Maybe fresh blood will bring the change we need. New ones wouldn't be quite so influenced by the "old" ones if the old ones were leaving soon.
Correction: We never had term limits for Senators. The 17th Amendment provided for direct, popular election of Senators. Before that, Senators were selected by vote of state legislatures. In practice, this meant that Senators represented the concerns of state governments. Yes, they did get replaced at the end of their terms if another party had taken power in the state legislature, but that was not term limits. And, if one party controlled the state for decades, as the Democrats did in the South after the Civil War, then the same person might be re-elected many times. Other than that one quibble, your post is essentially correct.

:patriot: :txflag:
I think you missed my point. Because Senators were appointed by the Governor and/or the Legislature of each state, and because the Governor and the legislatures are often changing their political makeup, Senators effectively had term limits. My apologies if I was too obtuse.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

TacShot
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:52 pm

Re: Do you support term limits for national / state offices?

#32

Post by TacShot »

I have always found polls to be an interesting display of human nature. As I view the results of this poll, I have to ask how many would be in favor of term limits if we held the White House and both houses of Congress. People always want term limits when their guy in not in office.
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide." The Monument Builders, Ayn Rand (1962)
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”