Also, they woke the magistrate so she wouldn't have to spend the night in jail!!
Disgusting...what else can be said?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c0d/44c0dfa59c9ce4ca3faaa4029765db8b091ee23b" alt="mad5 :mad5"
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/crim ... -dr/nXLXF/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
How does one "refuse" ?? ..texanjoker wrote:Not sure about the waking magistrate part as there is a judge working at night downtown to magistrate people. I'll be curious to see if she submitted to a chemical test, or acted like the rest of Travis County and refused. Their conviction rate is pitiful for DWI's and it is the county attorney that handles first time DWI and not the DA.
Aside from APD when they have no refusal days (days where they get court orders for everybody that refuses to comply with the law) when people refuse to voluntarily submit to the chemical test, it is common practices and they do not get a court ordered blood draw. There are often articles on this topic as the public is up in arms over court ordered blood draws. Everybody consents to that when they get the driver's license.E.Marquez wrote:How does one "refuse" ?? ..texanjoker wrote:Not sure about the waking magistrate part as there is a judge working at night downtown to magistrate people. I'll be curious to see if she submitted to a chemical test, or acted like the rest of Travis County and refused. Their conviction rate is pitiful for DWI's and it is the county attorney that handles first time DWI and not the DA.
Ok let me rephrase, yes they can refuse, and the LEO can then request a blood warrant based on his PC and evidence observed so far. The Judge issues warrant, blood is drawn, chemical BAC info is now on hand as evidence as well.
What am I missing on the "if she submitted to a chemical test, or acted like the rest of Travis County and refused."![]()
![]()
Thanks
Charles, Charles, Charles, you know that convicted Democrats don't resign from office. You know this. It's well known by everyone in America, and no one really cares or does anything about it, because, after all, their hearts are in the right place. They're just human, like all of us.Charles L. Cotton wrote:She has admitted she's guilty and will plead guilty. She didn't say she was going to resign and I find this absurd. How can she or someone in her office go before a jury and ask them to send another DWI defendant to jail or prison?
Chas.
The part that does bother me is that they keep referring to her as the top law enforcement official. The rest of us that are the real law enforcement officials would automatically loose our police license for 10 years and be fired for a dwi conviction. Funny how attorneys that are described as the top law enforcement official don't fall under that same standard...Charles L. Cotton wrote:She has admitted she's guilty and will plead guilty. She didn't say she was going to resign and I find this absurd. How can she or someone in her office go before a jury and ask them to send another DWI defendant to jail or prison?
Chas.
texanjoker wrote:Aside from APD when they have no refusal days (days where they get court orders for everybody that refuses to comply with the law) when people refuse to voluntarily submit to the chemical test, it is common practices and they do not get a court ordered blood draw. There are often articles on this topic as the public is up in arms over court ordered blood draws. Everybody consents to that when they get the driver's license.E.Marquez wrote:How does one "refuse" ?? ..texanjoker wrote:Not sure about the waking magistrate part as there is a judge working at night downtown to magistrate people. I'll be curious to see if she submitted to a chemical test, or acted like the rest of Travis County and refused. Their conviction rate is pitiful for DWI's and it is the county attorney that handles first time DWI and not the DA.
Ok let me rephrase, yes they can refuse, and the LEO can then request a blood warrant based on his PC and evidence observed so far. The Judge issues warrant, blood is drawn, chemical BAC info is now on hand as evidence as well.
What am I missing on the "if she submitted to a chemical test, or acted like the rest of Travis County and refused."![]()
![]()
Thanks
In reading the news today it said they had to get a court ordered blood draw, so she may very well have refused. All the attorneys advertise to refuse the test as this way they can beat the DWI rap and then fight DPS regarding loosing the driver's license.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/loca ... ys-/nXMCY/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
texanjoker wrote:The part that does bother me is that they keep referring to her as the top law enforcement official. The rest of us that are the real law enforcement officials would automatically loose our police license for 10 years and be fired for a dwi conviction. Funny how attorneys that are described as the top law enforcement official don't fall under that same standard...Charles L. Cotton wrote:She has admitted she's guilty and will plead guilty. She didn't say she was going to resign and I find this absurd. How can she or someone in her office go before a jury and ask them to send another DWI defendant to jail or prison?
Chas.
You are hired by an organization that has established rules, policies, etc. An elected official is "hired" by the electorate which is the sole judge of performance, suitability. There are no policies, no standards, whatever you can get away with. We have witnessed thoroughly despicable men and women returned to office despite the most immoral, heinous and irresponsible conduct, and good men turned out of office for trivial, or no, reason at all, other than the opponent was "cooler."texanjoker wrote:The part that does bother me is that they keep referring to her as the top law enforcement official. The rest of us that are the real law enforcement officials would automatically loose our police license for 10 years and be fired for a dwi conviction. Funny how attorneys that are described as the top law enforcement official don't fall under that same standard...Charles L. Cotton wrote:She has admitted she's guilty and will plead guilty. She didn't say she was going to resign and I find this absurd. How can she or someone in her office go before a jury and ask them to send another DWI defendant to jail or prison?
Chas.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:She has admitted she's guilty and will plead guilty. She didn't say she was going to resign and I find this absurd. How can she or someone in her office go before a jury and ask them to send another DWI defendant to jail or prison?
Chas.