“They all have gun ports… Gun Ports? In the theater of war, yes. On the streets of America…?
Seriously, why would DHS need such a vehicle on our streets?”
Why indeed? It is utterly inconceivable that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is planning a coup d’etat against President Obama, and the Congress, to install herself as Supreme Ruler of the United States of America. There, however, are real signs that the Department bureaucrats are running amok. About 20 years ago this columnist worked, for two years, in the U.S. Department of Energy’s general counsel’s office in its procurement and finance division. And is wise to the ways. The answer to “why would DHS need such a vehicle?” almost certainly is this: it’s a cool toy and these (reportedly) million dollar toys are being recycled, without much of a impact on the DHS budget. So… why not?
Why, indeed, should the federal government not be deploying armored personnel carriers and stockpiling enough ammo for a 20-year war in the homeland? Because it’s wrong in every way. President Obama has an opportunity, now, to live up to some of his rhetoric by helping the federal government set a noble example in a matter very close to his heart (and that of his Progressive base), one not inimical to the Bill of Rights: gun control. The federal government can (for a nice change) begin practicing what it preaches by controlling itself.
Time for a differnt national conversation
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6096
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
- Location: Victoria, Texas
Time for a differnt national conversation
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/ ... versation/
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
- Location: Just west of Cool, Texas
Re: Time for a differnt national conversation
OR...
We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
-Barack Obama - July 2, 2008
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2807
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
- Location: Houston
Re: Time for a differnt national conversation
Oh, come on, now. Those things are going to be used to secure our border. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc79/5fc79b9c34d22661c5497fb36575152aa3bed3ff" alt="rlol "rlol""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc79/5fc79b9c34d22661c5497fb36575152aa3bed3ff" alt="rlol "rlol""
Byron Dickens
Re: Time for a differnt national conversation
Hmm...I suppose if you parked them end to end they would make a formidable looking wall.....bdickens wrote:Oh, come on, now. Those things are going to be used to secure our border.