‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#91

Post by sjfcontrol »

chasfm11 wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
Dave2 wrote:Did anyone else see Geraldo Rivera on the O'Reilly Factor with Laura Ingraham tonight? Wow... I'm not even sure how I'd describe that... :headscratch

In any case, my opinion of him is much lower now.
For those of us who didn't, what happened?
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/i ... t_id=86923

Geraldo said "gun walking is done all the time" among many stupid things. "This investigation is all political hackery"

Laura accused him of grandstanding. It is quite an exchange.

That WAS interesting...

Note to Geraldo: Just because YOUR vault was empty, doesn't mean everybody's is! :smilelol5:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

emcee rib
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#92

Post by emcee rib »

The misnamed DOJ refused to arrest Holder. They're traitors plain and simple.
We declare our right on this earth to be a man, to be a human being, to be respected as a human being, to be given the rights of a human being in this society, on this earth, in this day, which we intend to bring into existence by any means necessary.

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#93

Post by Dave2 »

emcee rib wrote:The misnamed DOJ refused to arrest Holder. They're traitors plain and simple.
From what the talking heads are saying, nobody expected the DOJ to actually do anything about the contempt of congress charge. This is why they also held him in civil contempt of congress, which authorizes them to prosecute him themselves.

Now, where did I put that video... oh yeah, here it is (there's a bit of NSFW language):
[youtube][/youtube]
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#94

Post by Dave2 »

Fox News is saying that Issa has put proof that Holder flat-out lied to congress about this in the congressional record, but there's nothing on foxnews.com yet.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

Heartland Patriot

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#95

Post by Heartland Patriot »

Dave2 wrote:
emcee rib wrote:The misnamed DOJ refused to arrest Holder. They're traitors plain and simple.
From what the talking heads are saying, nobody expected the DOJ to actually do anything about the contempt of congress charge. This is why they also held him in civil contempt of congress, which authorizes them to prosecute him themselves.

Now, where did I put that video... oh yeah, here it is (there's a bit of NSFW language):
[youtube][/youtube]

He covered it pretty well, concise and to the point.
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#96

Post by 74novaman »

57Coastie wrote:Here is an investigative report by Fortune, that well-known ultra liberal left wing member of the media.

http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2 ... ous-truth/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jim
Just stumbled across John Lott's response to this article. I thought it was informative.

http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/2012/06/w ... -eban.html
TANSTAAFL

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#97

Post by Rex B »

Ann Coulter has a good article on F&F:

" "This isn't just another government program gone bad -- a $300 ashtray, stimulus money fraud, Solyndra or Van Jones. ... It would be as if the Bush administration had implemented a covert operation to dump a dangerous abortifacient in Planned Parenthood clinics, resulting in hundreds of women dying -- just to give pro-lifers an argument about how dangerous abortion clinics are. That's what Fast and Furious is about." --columnist Ann Coulter"
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”