‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

hi-power
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#76

Post by hi-power »

Lots of Dems walked out, but the Contempt of Congress Resolution against Holder just passed:
Yea - 255
Nay - 67
Present - 1
Not Voting - 110

2 Republicans voted no.
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#77

Post by XinTX »

Like to know who those two are.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
User avatar

hi-power
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#78

Post by hi-power »

Republican No Votes:
Rep. Stephen Latourette - Ohio
Rep. Scott Rigell - Virginia

Democrat Yes Votes:
Rep. Mike Ross - Arkansas
Rep. John Barrow - Georgia
Rep. Leonard Boswell - Iowa
Rep. Joe Donnelly - Indiana
Rep. Ben Chandler - Kentucky
Rep. Timothy Walz - Minnesota
Rep. Collin Peterson - Minnesota
Rep. Mike McIntyre - North Carolina
Rep. Larry Kissell - North Carolina
Rep. William Owens - New York
Rep. Kathleen Hochul - New York
Rep. Dan Boren - Oklahoma
Rep. Jason Altmire - Pennsylvania
Rep. Mark Critz - Pennsylvania
Rep. Jim Matheson - Utah
Rep. Ronald Kind - Wisconsin
Rep. Nick Rahall - West Virginia
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#79

Post by mojo84 »

hi-power wrote:Lots of Dems walked out, but the Contempt of Congress Resolution against Holder just passed:
Yea - 255
Nay - 67
Present - 1
Not Voting - 110

2 Republicans voted no.
... and 21 or so dems vote Yea.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#80

Post by VMI77 »

hi-power wrote:Lots of Dems walked out, but the Contempt of Congress Resolution against Holder just passed:
Yea - 255
Nay - 67
Present - 1
Not Voting - 110

2 Republicans voted no.

Now, why would they walk out, and not just vote no? Could it be they don't want a no vote on the record?
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

Topic author
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#81

Post by The Annoyed Man »

VMI77 wrote:
hi-power wrote:Lots of Dems walked out, but the Contempt of Congress Resolution against Holder just passed:
Yea - 255
Nay - 67
Present - 1
Not Voting - 110

2 Republicans voted no.
Now, why would they walk out, and not just vote no? Could it be they don't want a no vote on the record?
Could be, but more likely it's that whenever the political going gets tough, the democrats leave town (Texas redistricting, Minnesota right-to-work bill). They take their toys and go home and don't want to play anymore. Children.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

AEA
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#82

Post by AEA »

Every Dem that walked out needs to be defeated in their next election. This is the list. Get 'er done!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#83

Post by sjfcontrol »

Why limit it to the ones that walked out? :headscratch
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#84

Post by Dave2 »

XinTX wrote:Like to know who those two are.
Steven LaTourette (R) - Ohio, District 14
Scott Rigell (R) - Virginia, District 2
and one that didn't vote:
Jerry Lewis (R) - California, District 41
Source

Now, there were two votes... one for Contempt of Congress (this one with the two republicans voting against), and one for something to do with Civil Contempt of Congress (dunno the difference... I think the civil kind allows congress to get uncivilized on someone). In that vote, no republicans voted no, but four didn't vote at all:
Jeff Fortenberry (R) - Nebraska, District 1
Andy Harris (R) - Maryland, District 1
Vicky Hartzler (R) - Missouri, District 4
Jerry Lewis (R) - California, District 41
Source
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

hi-power
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#85

Post by hi-power »

Shocker! :shock:

Justice Department shields Holder from prosecution after contempt vote
Deputy Attorney General James Cole confirmed in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner that the department in fact would not pursue prosecution. The attorney general's withholding of documents pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, he wrote, "does not constitute a crime."
User avatar

hi-power
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#86

Post by hi-power »

Here's an interesting article on DOJ's stance on executive privilege asserted by the White House in the Fast & Furious debacle compared to DOJ's stance on Texas' deliberative process privilege in the upcoming Texas Voter ID Law case scheduled to start July 9th, 2012.

Link
It’s clear, when one compares the Justice Department’s position on executive and deliberate process privilege in the Texas voter ID litigation with its position on the privilege in the congressional investigation of Operation Fast and Furious, that neither Eric Holder nor Barack Obama want the same rules applied to them that they would apply to the governor of Texas and members of the state legislature. They don’t believe there are any privileges that should apply to shield the state’s documents, and if there are, they should be “abrogated” by a court because of the “extraordinary” importance of upholding the requirements of the Voting Rights Act.

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#87

Post by Dave2 »

Did anyone else see Geraldo Rivera on the O'Reilly Factor with Laura Ingraham tonight? Wow... I'm not even sure how I'd describe that... :headscratch

In any case, my opinion of him is much lower now.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#88

Post by sjfcontrol »

Dave2 wrote:Did anyone else see Geraldo Rivera on the O'Reilly Factor with Laura Ingraham tonight? Wow... I'm not even sure how I'd describe that... :headscratch

In any case, my opinion of him is much lower now.
For those of us who didn't, what happened?
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4152
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#89

Post by chasfm11 »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Dave2 wrote:Did anyone else see Geraldo Rivera on the O'Reilly Factor with Laura Ingraham tonight? Wow... I'm not even sure how I'd describe that... :headscratch

In any case, my opinion of him is much lower now.
For those of us who didn't, what happened?
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/i ... t_id=86923

Geraldo said "gun walking is done all the time" among many stupid things. "This investigation is all political hackery"

Laura accused him of grandstanding. It is quite an exchange.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
User avatar

Topic author
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....

#90

Post by The Annoyed Man »

"The Mustache" is anything but a conservative, and he just doesn't know much about guns except that they make "The Mustache" look even more macho if he carries one in Afghannyland where all macho men with mustaches have guns. I ceased being impressed with that blister a long time ago.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”