Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#16

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Oldgringo wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
RPB wrote:ObamaCare ... allowed an Opt-Out
Not really. Beginning in 2013, the IRS will begin fining me $225/month for not having any insurance. I can't afford insurance because I am self employed, in this economy, and I don't earn enough to get it, and because of several pre-existing conditions for which most insurance companies have rejected me. Believe me, I've tried. Since I have too much in the way of assets (own my home free and clear, and nice retirement investment nest egg), I am not eligible for the public dole—not that I would accept it even if I were. My total annual medical care costs me less than $2,000/year—all dr.'s office visits, prescriptions, and lab tests included—but the absolute cheapest insurance I can get (Texas High Risk Pool) would cost me $543/month, has a $7,500 deductible plus $5,000 out of pocket for a total expenditure of $19,500/year before I actually have any coverage......and it won't cover me for the first year for any pre-existing conditions. It gets worse from there when you look at what insurance companies want to charge me. And since I can afford to pay for my annual medical care needs out of pocket, I don't need any stinking insurance.

So, thanks to Obamacare, I have a choice between bankruptcy, or pay a fine.....for which I still get no coverage. Come 2013, I'll have the choice to pay Obama my monthly ransom and stay out of jail, or keep the lights on and go to jail for stiffing the IRS. I very sincerely hope he chokes on a chicken bone. He is a stupid and evil man who never thought out the consequences of his policies. What is going to happen to me in 2013 is exactly why Pelosi insisted that we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it. She didn't want anybody to know beforehand what is actually going to happen to them. She is even more evil than Obama. I hope Pelosi chokes on her own vomit and becomes brain dead, so that she can spend the rest of her life at the mercy of the system she helped to destroy.

To all of you who voted for Obama, you did this to me. You think about that the next time one of you wonders why I am so vehemently in contempt of democrats and their corrupt and irresponsible party.

I don't think much of Romney, but I'll choke on my own chicken bone before I'll see another 4 years of Obama. That man is the devil. 3rd party, write-ins, etc., are not an option for me. Obama must be defeated at all costs, whatever they may be.

Don't hold back, TAM. Tell us how you really feel.

(FWIW, Mrs. Oldgringo and I enjoyed the "benefits" of the the Texas High Risk Pool while anxiously waiting to turn 65.)
I'm happy you enjoyed it. They won't cover for the first year any of the things for which I currently see a doctor. Why on earth would I pay $6K/year in premiums for that.... not to mention the huge deductible and out of pocket amounts?
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#17

Post by sjfcontrol »

Gee, TAM, why don't you tell us what you really think! ;-)

Seriously, though, I know where you're coming from. I'm on the Texas risk pool, and the coverage is strictly for
emergencies. I'm am surprised, though. I though that like me, you were of an age where you'd be insane to go without insurance. Without insurance, a simple heart attack would likely be a death sentence. And cancer -- well save your last round... :cheers2:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#18

Post by Oldgringo »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
RPB wrote:ObamaCare ... allowed an Opt-Out
Not really. Beginning in 2013, the IRS will begin fining me $225/month for not having any insurance. I can't afford insurance because I am self employed, in this economy, and I don't earn enough to get it, and because of several pre-existing conditions for which most insurance companies have rejected me. Believe me, I've tried. Since I have too much in the way of assets (own my home free and clear, and nice retirement investment nest egg), I am not eligible for the public dole—not that I would accept it even if I were. My total annual medical care costs me less than $2,000/year—all dr.'s office visits, prescriptions, and lab tests included—but the absolute cheapest insurance I can get (Texas High Risk Pool) would cost me $543/month, has a $7,500 deductible plus $5,000 out of pocket for a total expenditure of $19,500/year before I actually have any coverage......and it won't cover me for the first year for any pre-existing conditions. It gets worse from there when you look at what insurance companies want to charge me. And since I can afford to pay for my annual medical care needs out of pocket, I don't need any stinking insurance.

So, thanks to Obamacare, I have a choice between bankruptcy, or pay a fine.....for which I still get no coverage. Come 2013, I'll have the choice to pay Obama my monthly ransom and stay out of jail, or keep the lights on and go to jail for stiffing the IRS. I very sincerely hope he chokes on a chicken bone. He is a stupid and evil man who never thought out the consequences of his policies. What is going to happen to me in 2013 is exactly why Pelosi insisted that we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it. She didn't want anybody to know beforehand what is actually going to happen to them. She is even more evil than Obama. I hope Pelosi chokes on her own vomit and becomes brain dead, so that she can spend the rest of her life at the mercy of the system she helped to destroy.

To all of you who voted for Obama, you did this to me. You think about that the next time one of you wonders why I am so vehemently in contempt of democrats and their corrupt and irresponsible party.

I don't think much of Romney, but I'll choke on my own chicken bone before I'll see another 4 years of Obama. That man is the devil. 3rd party, write-ins, etc., are not an option for me. Obama must be defeated at all costs, whatever they may be.

Don't hold back, TAM. Tell us how you really feel.

(FWIW, Mrs. Oldgringo and I enjoyed the "benefits" of the the Texas High Risk Pool while anxiously waiting to turn 65.)
I'm happy you enjoyed it. They won't cover for the first year any of the things for which I currently see a doctor. Why on earth would I pay $6K/year in premiums for that.... not to mention the huge deductible and out of pocket amounts?

Enjoyed = {Sarcasm :mrgreen: } to it's highest level.

Carotid artery surgery pretty much makes one uninsurable by the destitute insurance companies, hospitals and doctors. :mrgreen: BTW, we did/do not have a nice retirement nest egg; the obscene premium cost came out of our hard earned savings.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#19

Post by The Annoyed Man »

sjfcontrol wrote:Gee, TAM, why don't you tell us what you really think! ;-)

Seriously, though, I know where you're coming from. I'm on the Texas risk pool, and the coverage is strictly for
emergencies. I'm am surprised, though. I though that like me, you were of an age where you'd be insane to go without insurance. Without insurance, a simple heart attack would likely be a death sentence. And cancer -- well save your last round... :cheers2:
If I have a catastrophic medical event, I can tap either my retirement package or borrow against my home to pay for it......or just not worry about it and go home to Jesus. I am not afraid of what lies beyond the grave. Also, I deal with the potential of heart attack by eating right, and getting to the gym 3 times a week.

In any case, it doesn't matter. I can't afford the rate the THRP charges. I simply can't. So it doesn't matter. What does matter is that, because I can't afford it, I have to pay a fine in 2013. Not an annual fine, a monthly fine. That's in the Obamacare bill as passed. That fine is roughly equal to what a health insurance policy used to cost about 15 years ago for a relatively healthy individual. The democrat party is evil and must be destroyed.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#20

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Oldgringo wrote:Enjoyed = {Sarcasm :mrgreen: } to it's highest level.

Carotid artery surgery pretty much makes one uninsurable by the destitute insurance companies, hospitals and doctors. :mrgreen: BTW, we did/do not have a nice retirement nest egg; the obscene premium cost came out of our hard earned savings.
No, I got the sarcasm. I was returning the favor. The only reason I have a retirement nest egg is because somebody died and left it to me. Between Obamacare, Obamanomics, and Congress's serial mismanagement of Social Security, I don't expect that it will last long.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#21

Post by Oldgringo »

Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?

We toured Salt Lake City and its Temple Square a couple of weeks ago on our way home from Glacier country. Most impressed were we. That said, the LDS DOES NOT Allow guns in its Utah churches. Check it out here. I carried in Temple Square and around town but since I am not a Mormon I couldn't enter their houses of worship anyway.

Personally, I can't differentiate between most any religion EXCEPT Islam. I ain't got no use at all for those muslims and I most surely will not intentionally do anything to get one elected or re-elected, as the case may be.
Last edited by Oldgringo on Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#22

Post by apostate »

Oldgringo wrote:Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?
That's true, and in Romney's case, we're fortunate to have his actions as an elected official (Governor) to guide us.
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#23

Post by Oldgringo »

apostate wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?
That's true, and in Romney's case, we're fortunate to have his actions as an elected official (Governor) to guide us.
Is it Romney, Perry, Cain, Bachman, et al, or is it the Republican Party that has failed us? It is the partys' (bofum) resposibility to provide its supporters with a viable candidate and platform to vote "FOR" rather than something/somebody to vote against.

Somebody please help me. I'm still leaning toward voting for ME.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#24

Post by RPB »

Oldgringo wrote:
apostate wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?
That's true, and in Romney's case, we're fortunate to have his actions as an elected official (Governor) to guide us.
Is it Romney, Perry, Cain, Bachman, et al, or is it the Republican Party that has failed us? It is the partys' (bofum) resposibility to provide its supporters with a viable candidate and platform to vote "FOR" rather than something/somebody to vote against.

Somebody please help me. I'm still leaning toward voting for ME.
If Romney is the only alternative to Obama, I'll vote for you too :mrgreen:
His track record as an elected official stinks.
viewtopic.php?f=94&t=48812#p600465" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

Dragonfighter
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#25

Post by Dragonfighter »

Oldgringo wrote:Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?
Character and ideals are often compromised by circumstance.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#26

Post by Purplehood »

C-dub wrote:I hope that all of you "I won't vote for Romney" folks won't feel that way if he's the republican nominee. Due to one of his recent speeches about the world being a better place when America is strong he is sounding stronger and stronger and more and more like Reagan. I have my reservations and do not remember much about Reagan the candidate. I didn't start paying much attention to politics at all until the late 80's.

I think, but could be wrong, any republican nominee is going to be way better than what we have now.
I am not going to vote for Mitt Romney because he sounds like Reagan.

I am not going to vote for Mitt Romney, period.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07

boba

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#27

Post by boba »

Oldgringo wrote:
RPB wrote:No, I'll not vote for him if he's the GOP candidate.

I never intentionally vote for anyone who disregards (has a track record for disregarding) rights.
So, who will you vote for? A non vote is a yes vote for the incumbent, Bucko.
No. The incumbent already has the office. A non vote is a yes vote for the challenger. Everyone knows that.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#28

Post by sjfcontrol »

boba wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:
RPB wrote:No, I'll not vote for him if he's the GOP candidate.

I never intentionally vote for anyone who disregards (has a track record for disregarding) rights.
So, who will you vote for? A non vote is a yes vote for the incumbent, Bucko.
No. The incumbent already has the office. A non vote is a yes vote for the challenger. Everyone knows that.
Oh, so we can all stay home on election day! :woohoo
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

EconDoc
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#29

Post by EconDoc »

C-dub wrote:I hope that all of you "I won't vote for Romney" folks won't feel that way if he's the republican nominee. Due to one of his recent speeches about the world being a better place when America is strong he is sounding stronger and stronger and more and more like Reagan. I have my reservations and do not remember much about Reagan the candidate. I didn't start paying much attention to politics at all until the late 80's.

I think, but could be wrong, any republican nominee is going to be way better than what we have now.
Never believe what any politician says. Only trust what they do. A politician's record is a much better guide to their future actions than anything that they say during a campaign. After all, "How can you tell if a politician is lying? Look to see if the lips are moving."
Sauron lives and his orc minions are on the march. Free people own guns.

Heartland Patriot

Re: Mitt Romney talks about gun control in 2007

#30

Post by Heartland Patriot »

boba wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:
RPB wrote:No, I'll not vote for him if he's the GOP candidate.

I never intentionally vote for anyone who disregards (has a track record for disregarding) rights.
So, who will you vote for? A non vote is a yes vote for the incumbent, Bucko.
No. The incumbent already has the office. A non vote is a yes vote for the challenger. Everyone knows that.
Please explain to me, in this era of the media all but being a mouthpiece for the Democrat Party and thus that man in the White House, how you can say that a non-vote is a yes vote for the challenger...it will take every last vote that can be mustered to ouster him (unless you would rather have that man remain in the office). I promise you that the dead WILL vote in Chicago, that votes WILL be found in the trunks of cars in Minnesota and that people who are NOT American citizens in any form or fashion WILL cast votes in places like Denver (and many others)...and they will ALL go to the man in the White House. And because many of you dislike some things about Mitt Romney, you are willing to force another four years of that man in the White House upon us? I really don't know what to think anymore...I used to think of most folks who were pro-firearms a certain way, but I guess I was flat-out wrong. My apologies for my mistake.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”