Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
AJ80
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:37 pm

Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#1

Post by AJ80 »

Did the texting while driving bill pass?

If so, does that include even sending the text message by dictating it to your phone via voice commands?

And to make this gun related. Does it also include typing a text message with the nose of your pistol?
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#2

Post by sjfcontrol »

AJ80 wrote:Did the texting while driving bill pass?

If so, does that include even sending the text message by dictating it to your phone via voice commands?

And to make this gun related. Does it also include typing a text message with the nose of your pistol?
Never point your gun at anything you're not willing to destroy! :lol::
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#3

Post by SQLGeek »

sjfcontrol wrote: Never point your gun at anything you're not willing to destroy! :lol::
Well in that case...

:fire
Psalm 91:2

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#4

Post by RPB »

IIRC the final version includes not only "typing" a text, but "reading" one too.

Eyes on the road; Pull over, stay safe.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#5

Post by sjfcontrol »

what if it's not a text? Email? A map? I've even seen people reading books in slow traffic. Non-electronic reading material?

This whole thing is silly. There are infinite 'distractions' that a driver is subject to. Are we going to outlaw all of them separately?

What about checking out the good-looking person (pick your sex) walking down the sidewalk? Are we going to outlaw that, too?
How about fiddling with electronic equipment, radios, GPS, etc?
:mad5
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Divided Attention
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:03 pm

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#6

Post by Divided Attention »

Of course it will help - if they pass a law everyone will follow it! It is too bad they can't outlaw stupid!
Blessed be the LORD, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle; Psalm 144:1-2
CHL - 2010; NRA RSO - 2011, NRA Chief RSO - 2014
NRA Pistol Instructor -2013, NRA Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor - 2015
Lifetime NRA Member - 2013
User avatar

i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#7

Post by i8godzilla »

Divided Attention wrote:Of course it will help - if they pass a law everyone will follow it! It is too bad they can't outlaw stupid!
Then they would all be in jail........... :leaving
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham

Topic author
AJ80
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#8

Post by AJ80 »

I can download an app to read texts to me when I receive one then to reply,I just gave to hold down a button for a second or two and tell my phone what to text and to who.

Would that be illegal under the new law? I mean, I'd actually have to touch a button on my phone.
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#9

Post by SewTexas »

This whole thing is silly. There are infinite 'distractions' that a driver is subject to. Are we going to outlaw all of them separately?
You know what they would have to outlaw, don't you? KIDS! I've often wondered how many accidents are caused by moms having to deal with kids fussing in the car....I've never been so "distracted" as when the kids were young and/or fighting....now...they want to drive...ugggg.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#10

Post by sjfcontrol »

SewTexas wrote:
This whole thing is silly. There are infinite 'distractions' that a driver is subject to. Are we going to outlaw all of them separately?
You know what they would have to outlaw, don't you? KIDS! I've often wondered how many accidents are caused by moms having to deal with kids fussing in the car....I've never been so "distracted" as when the kids were young and/or fighting....now...they want to drive...ugggg.
Of course they would. My argument against the anti-celllphone laws were that children should be outlawed from cars in school zones before cellphones! (After all, its for the children! :lol: )
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

Topic author
AJ80
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#11

Post by AJ80 »

OK I think I found the answer to my questions

(c-1) An operator may not use a hand-held wireless
communication device to read, write, or send a text-based
communication while operating a motor vehicle unless the vehicle is
stopped.
(c-2) An operator is not subject to prosecution under
Subsection (c-1) if
:
(1) the operator uses a hand-held wireless
communication device
:
(A) to read, select, or enter a telephone number
or name for the purpose of making a telephone call;
(B) in conjunction with voice-operated
technology or a hands-free device
; or
(C) to navigate using a global positioning
system; or
(2) the hand-held wireless communication device:
(A) is used by the operator to relay information
between the operator and a dispatcher in the course of the
operator's occupational duties; and
(B) is affixed to the vehicle.

So if I use voice commands to send a text message, I'm safe.
If I use my gun as a hands free device then... my phone might have a few holes in it... :leaving

Topic author
AJ80
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#12

Post by AJ80 »

Oh! That gives me an idea!!!
Metal targets that when hit with a bullet, presses a key on a cell phone!
It could be the next big thing!

A competition could be help and whoever makes the least typos wins!

OK, so not very feasible.

*Message sent via Glock 26* "rlol"
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#13

Post by sjfcontrol »

Hmmm, so if your iPhone is connected to the car via the docking connector, is it still considered a "wireless"'device?
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

Bullwhip
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#14

Post by Bullwhip »

sjfcontrol wrote:what if it's not a text? Email? A map? I've even seen people reading books in slow traffic. Non-electronic reading material?

This whole thing is silly. There are infinite 'distractions' that a driver is subject to. Are we going to outlaw all of them separately?

What about checking out the good-looking person (pick your sex) walking down the sidewalk? Are we going to outlaw that, too?
How about fiddling with electronic equipment, radios, GPS, etc?
:mad5
+10000

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Texting bill - made it gun related kind of.

#15

Post by KD5NRH »

sjfcontrol wrote:Never point your gun at anything you're not willing to destroy! :lol::
Clearly you've never used an LG GR500. :fire :smash: :cup:
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”