![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![headscratch :headscratch](./images/smilies/headscratch.gif)
It will be interesting to see how many Dem politicians start jumping ship. The Repubs are unanimously against it.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
look at the deficits that the post office is runningDudley wrote:Why are you surprised? Higher costs are common when a government nationalizes any industry.
Yeah, they did a great job with Amtrak too...92f-fan wrote: Lets help them take over health care .........
mr.72 wrote:
Small wonder our government schools are not teaching future voters about the folly of socialism and merits of smaller government's link to liberty.
I'm not surprised. It was my attempt at sarcasm. I have been expecting healthcare costs to shoot to the stratosphere, and someone has to pay for it.Dudley wrote:Why are you surprised? Higher costs are common when a government nationalizes any industry.
When the prices go up the choices will be removed for many people. Health care now cost me about 35% of my take home income. Taking a chance against a disease we don't have against the certainty of losing ones home or going hungry, might make giving up health insurance a not so difficult decision. The costs have been increasing at absurd rates in the past, the Obama tax is going to put a lot of people over the top. The funny thing is that it will be the healthy people dropping out, and the sicklier people left. driving the rates up even higher.Abraham wrote:Go without medical insurance and hope for the best.
If something spouts blood head to the emergency room.
Then, when cancer, stroke, heart attack, (choose your favorite) arrives, plan on that doing you in without further ado.
Easy.
With or without medical insurance, you ain't getting outta this world alive...so relax.
He relocated to a country with tort reform and cut his health costs in half.Liberty wrote:Where is John Galt?
We had that here in Texas recently and look what it didn't do for us...Dudley wrote:He relocated to a country with tort reform and cut his health costs in half.Liberty wrote:Where is John Galt?
The problem of course is that health care is not like car insurance. As an absolute, unless you halt on an absolute basis technology and drug development, the cost of healthcare per person is going to rise. All those neat gadgets cost gobs of money. If you're going to have those neat gadgets then the cost is going to go up. After all, we went back to 1920s era healthcare, we could afford that with ease, but most of us would be dead before we hit 60...mr.72 wrote:Tort reform will not fix anything as long as the consumer of health care products and services is not the one bearing the cost of those products and services directly and has no incentive to choose products or services based on value, risk, and price.
The best thing we could do to fix this whole health care thing would be to outlaw employer-purchased health insurance plans and make every individual choose their health insurance on a one-by-one, month-by-month basis, according to their own needs and paid out of their own pocket. I guarantee you the cost of health insurance would go down necessarily as soon as you regular people have to write that check every month out of their own budgets.